The impact of the development of smart cities on the patent system: a comparison between Brazil and The United States of America (USA)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2025.v25i3.3071

Keywords:

Smart Cities; Patent System; New Institutional Economics

Abstract

Objective: This article aims to investigate the impact of the innovative concept of Smart Cities on the patent system, comparing the economies of a developing country such as Brazil and that of a developed country such as the United States of America (USA).

Methodology: The research constitutes an exploratory stage of data collection, adopting a quantitative-qualitative approach. Data was collected from 2015 to the present day. The research design is bibliographic, investigating the Web of Science and Scopus databases, as well as patent bases.

Relevance: Relevance consists of the need for in-depth studies on the impacts generated on a country by the economic development through the perception of the importance of adopting innovative technologies to change technological paradigms.

Main results: In both countries, the results show the concentration of patent applications in the IPC (International Patent Classification) H04, focusing on technologies linked to the Internet of Things (IoT). However, in Brazil the concentration of patent applications intended for application in Smart Cities had a small increase from 2021 onwards, while in the USA there was an exponential increase from 2019 onwards.

Theoretical Contributions: The influence of the technological trajectory of the countries analyzed can be seen, making it clear that in a country with a production economic matrix there is no significant impact on the patent system, while in a country with an economic matrix of knowledge, there is a large increase in patent filings.

Author Biographies

Laura Luce Maisonnave, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio Grande do Sul, Campus Porto Alegre.

Lawyer graduated from the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul. Master's degree in Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer for Innovation from the Federal Institute of Science and Technology of Rio Grande do Sul / PROFNIT. Postgraduate degree in Intellectual Property from FADERGS. Postgraduate degree in Business Law (LLM) from Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV/RJ). Proficient level in English (she was resident in London, United Kingdom, from October 2005 to August 2007). Partner at the Werutsky e Maisonnave Advogados Associados Law Firm.

Cláudio Vinícius Silva Farias, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio Grande do Sul, Campus Porto Alegre.

PhD in Rural Development (PGDR/UFRGS). Master’s in Economics (Unisinos). Bachelor’s in Business Administration (UFRGS). Winner of the Edson Potsch Magalhães Award for the best Doctoral Thesis in Rural Economics in 2016, granted by the Brazilian Society of Administration, Economics, and Rural Sociology (SOBER). Teaching and research experience in the fields of Administration and Industrial Economics, focusing primarily on the following topics: Cooperation and Coordination of Productive Sectors, Institutional Economics, Competitiveness, Innovation and Organizational and Technological Learning, Health Economics, and Technology. Currently the Coordinator of the Professional Master's in Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer for Innovation (PROFNIT), IFRS focal point. Full-Time Professor at the Porto Alegre Campus of the Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology of Rio Grande do Sul.

Sabrina Oliveira Xavier, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio Grande do Sul, Campus Porto Alegre.

PhD in Law from the University of Grenoble Alpes (2020) with a full doctoral program abroad. Thesis titled La thèse CIFRE: étude pluridisciplinaire d'un instrument juridique au service de la politique de recherche et d'innovation dans une approche Franco-Brésilienne. Master’s in Business Law from the University of Lille II (2004) with a full master’s program abroad, dissertation titled Étude Comparative des Droits d'auteur française et brésilienne sur les oeuvres de l' esprit des membres de la fonction publique. Attorney registered with the Brazilian Bar Association, RS Section (OAB/RS) No. 47,598 since 1999. Extensive experience as a jurist in Technology Innovation Centers (NIT), began activities at the Technology Interaction and Transfer Office (EITT) of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul-UFRGS (2000-2003). From 2004 to 2008, contracted as an attorney for UFRGS Press to handle publishing contracts, negotiate with authors, and oversee intellectual property matters. From 2008 to 2013, served as a jurist at the Technology Transfer Office (ETT) of the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul-PUCRS, providing legal advice to researchers on university-business-government relations, analyzing and drafting collaboration and technology transfer agreements, and offering legal opinions on intellectual property matters. Visiting Professor at IFRS Campus Porto Alegre, involved in the PROFNIT - Graduate Program in Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer for Innovation. Currently serves as a jurist at the Innovation Secretariat of Porto Alegre, actively involved in public contracting through the Startup Legal Framework. Director of Living Lab POA (Proof of Concept - POC, Regulatory Sandbox, and Public Contract for Innovative Solutions - CPSI), Coordinator of the Digital Law and Innovation Forum (FDDI), Executive Secretary of the Innovation Managers Forum of GRANPAL, Porto Alegre Representative at TECHROAD, RS Labs Network Representative, Member of the Digital Government Program of Porto Alegre, Member of the Startup and Technology Committee of the Brazilian Bar Association (ABA), and Coordinator of the Startup City Program in Pacto Alegre.

References

Abreu, J. P. M. de. & Marchiori, F. F. (2023) Ferramentas de avaliação de desempenho de cidades inteligentes: uma análise da norma ISO 37122:2019. PARC Pesq. em Arquit. e Constr., Campinas, SP, v. 14, p. e023002, ISSN 1980-6809. p 2.

Arwani, A. & Priyadi, U. (2024). The Role and Contribution of The New Institutional Economics In Economic System Performance. Journal Simki Economic, doi: 10.29407/jse.v7i1.508

Balland, P.A., Broekel, T., Diodato, D., Giuliani, E., Hausmann, R., O'Clery, N. & Rigby, D. (2022). Reprint of The new paradigm of economic complexity. Research policy, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104568

Barbosa, D. B. (2010) Uma Introdução à Propriedade Intelectual / Tratado da Propriedade Intelectual. Segunda Edição Revisada e Atualizada. Lumen Juris, p. 14 e 550.

Camargo, L. R. de. (2004). Complexidade e Teoria Econômica. Revista de Estudos Universitários. FGV-SP. V. 30, n. 2. Sorocaba, SP. p. 76.

Carvalho, S. M. S., Martin, A. R., Carneiro, A. G., Santos, E. R. & Barbosa, A. P. T. (2020) Smart Cities: avaliação das características dos ecossistemas de inovação de duas cidades inteligentes brasileiras. Cadernos de Prospecção – Salvador, v. 13, n. 3, p. 693-706, junho, p. 695.

Cavalcante, P. (2019). Inovação e políticas: superando o mito da ideia. Brasília: Ipea.

De Vries, H. A.; Bekkers, V.& Tummers, L. G. (2016). Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. Public Administration, v. 94, n. 1, p. 146-166.

Farias, C. V. S. (2016). O papel das Instituições na formação e transformação da vitivinicultura da Serra Gaúcha: Possibilidades de interpretações do desenvolvimento rural pela nova economia institucional. Faculdade de Ciências Econômicas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Desenvolvimento Rural. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, p. 32.

Fernandes, J. L., Marchietti, I., Konopatzki, E. A. & Júnior, E. L. dos S. (2024). Prospecção Patentária de Alternativas Tecnológicas para o Gerenciamento da Pelagem Suína. Cadernos de Prospecção, Salvador, v. 17, n. 3, p. 900-915, julho a setembro, p. 901.

Gala, P. (2003). A Teoria Institucional de Douglass North. Revista de Economia Política, v. 23, n. 2, p. 89- 105, p. 92.

Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature. p. 1661 e 1662.

Harrison, B. E., Hamilton, R., Hartswick, P., Kalagnanam, J., Paraszczak, J, & Williams, P. (2010). Foundations for Smarter Cities. IBM Journal of Research and Development 54: 4, 1–16.

Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C., Bustos, S., Coscia, M. S. & Yildirim, A. M. (2011) The Atlas of Economics Complexity – Mapping Paths to prosperity. https://oec.world/en/.

Höjer, M. & Wangel, J. (2014). Smart Sustainable Cities: Definition and Challenges. In: Hilty, L.M., Aebischer, B. (eds.) ICT Innovations for Sustainability. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 310. Springer International Publishing, p. 5.

INPI – Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial (2024). Patentes. Disponível em: https://www.inpi.gov.br/patentes. Acesso em: 01 ago. 2024.

ISO - International Organization for Standardization 37122. (2019). Sustainable cities and communities — Indicators for smart cities. Reference number ISO 37122:2019. Edition 1 - 2019-05. Amostra disponível em https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:iso:37122:ed-1:v1:en.

ITU - Telecommunication Standardization Sector. (2014). ITU-T Y.4050-Y.4099 – Smart sustainable cities – an analysis of definitions. Focus Group Technical Report, p. 14.

Garcez Jr., S. S., Eloy, B. R., Santos, J. A. B. dos. (2021) A qualidade dos privilégios patentários concedidos no Brasil sob a ótica das ações judiciais de nulidade de patentes. Revista Direito GV, São Paulo, V. 17 N. 1 - e2116 p. 2.

Kalleya, C., Purnomo, A., Madyatmadja, E. D. & Karmagatri, M. M. (2023). Smart City Applications: A Patent Landscape Exploration. 8th International Conference on Computer Science and Computational Intelligence. Procedia Computer Science 227, 981–989. p. 2.

Kazyki, M. A. D., Moura, G. L. de., Marin, S. R.& Silva, L. S. C. V. da. (2021). Relação entre a Urbanização Brasileira e o Direito de Propriedade. Desenvolvimento em Questão. Editora Unijuí. ISSN 2237-6443. Ano 19. n. 54. p. 191.

Kochetkov, D. Vuković, D., Sadekov, N. & Levkiv, H. (2019) Smart cities and 5G networks: An emerging technological area? J. Geogr. Inst. Cvijic. 69(3), pp. 289–295

Lopes, D. & Leite, V. (2021). Cidades Inteligentes - conceitos e aplicações. EvEx Evidências Express. Diretoria de Altos Estudos da ENAP.

Marca, L., Silva, F., Edson, J. P., Bertol, M. E., Fritz, F. L. F. & Cruz, C. M. L. (2021). Estruturalismo latino-americano e complexidade econômica: uma análise comparativa da estrutura produtiva do Japão, Coreia do Sul, Cingapura e Brasil. Teoria e Evidência Econômica - a. 27, n. 56, p. 7-32, p. 12 e 28.

Merges, R. P. (1988). Commercial Success and Patent Standards: Economic Perspectives on Innovation. 76 Cal. L. Rev. 803, Available at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/facpubs/1505. p. 808.

Midor, K. & Plaza, G. (2020) Moving to Smart Cities Through the Standard Indicators ISO 37120. MAPE, volume 3, issue 1, pp. 617-630. SCIENDO. p. 2.

Miranda, F. C. P. de. (1977) Tratado de Direito Privado. Tomo XVI, Revista dos Tribunais, 4. ed., 1977.

Moura, F. R. de., Paes, N. L., Farias, T. A. (2014). O Impacto do Tempo de Pendência das Patentes na Trajetória de Crescimento: Uma Análise com Base no Modelo Schumpeteriano de Crescimento Endógeno com Avanço de Qualidade. RBE Rio de Janeiro v. 68 n. 1 / p. 125–145, p. 126.

Neto, M. S. (2016). Instituições e dinâmicas económicas e sociais: novas perspetivas teóricas e metodológicas. Universidade de Coimbra; Centro de História da Sociedade e da Cultura; Encontro da APHES, p. 4.

North, D. C. (1981). Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W.W. Norton, p. 201 e 202.

_________, D. C. (1990). Economic performance through time. In: ALSTON, L. et al. (Ed.). Empiric studies in institutional change Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 54.

_________, D. C. (1991). Institutions, transaction costs, and the rise of merchant empires. Chapter 1 of The political economy of merchant empires. Editor James D. Tracy. Cambridge University Press. p. 27.

Pedroso, L. L. de A., Souza, M. N. C. de S. & Soares, K. de J. (2021). Atlas da Complexidade Econômica de Harvard. Resenha Complexidade. Revista Inteligência Empresarial, 1. p. 7.

Piaia, T. C. (2013). PATH DEPENDENCE: as assimétricas trajetórias da institucionalização da inovação tecnológica no Brasil e nos Estados Unidos. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Faculdade de Direito. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito. p. 10 e 11.

Sharif, M.M. (2023). It’s All about Cities: We Mustn’t Flip the Coin on Sustainable Investment. United Nations Chronicle. Disponível em https://www.un.org/en/un-chronicle/it’s-all-about-cities-we-mustn’t-flip-coin-sustainable-investment.

Silva, V. de S., Felizardo, L. F. & Dutra, A. C. (2020) Smart City: um estudo prospectivo da tecnologia com base nas patentes. Cadernos de Prospecção – Salvador, v. 13, n. 1, p. 171-183, p. 175 e 182.

The Atlas of Economic Complexity (2024). Harvard University. Disponível em

http://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/. Acesso em: 20 out. 2024.

USPTO – United States Patent and Trademark Office (2024). Patents. Disponível em: https://www.uspto.gov/patents. Acesso em: 01 ago. 2024.

WCCD – World Council on City Data (2020). ISO 37122:2020 – Cidades e comunidades sustentáveis: Indicadores para cidades inteligentes. Disponível em: https://www.dataforcities.org/iso-37122. Acesso em: 01 ago. 2024.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Luce Maisonnave, L., Silva Farias, C. V., & Oliveira Xavier, S. (2025). The impact of the development of smart cities on the patent system: a comparison between Brazil and The United States of America (USA) . Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 25(3), 218–236. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2025.v25i3.3071

Issue

Section

ARTIGO