Giving up for a Greater Good: A Systematic Review Exploring Sacrifice in Sustainable Consumer Behavior

Agatha Moura; Salomão Alencar de Farias

doi:10.20397/2177-6652/2026.v26i3.3212

Autores

Agatha Moura Universidade Federal de Pernambuco https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0480-5028
Salomão Alencar de Farias UFPE https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5415-2606

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2026.v26i3.3212

Palavras-chave:

Consumer Behavior; Sacrifice; Sustainable Consumption; Pro-Environmental Behavior; Consumer Sacrifice.

Resumo

Objetivo: Este estudo tem como objetivo investigar o papel do sacrifício no comportamento sustentável do consumidor, sintetizando a literatura existente sobre o tema e explorando como o sacrifício pode ser percebido como uma barreira ou um catalisador na adoção de práticas sustentáveis.

Metodologia: Foi realizada uma Revisão Sistemática da Literatura (RSL), com base no protocolo SPAR-4-SLR, abrangendo artigos revisados por pares publicados entre 2011 e 2023. A seleção seguiu critérios rigorosos de inclusão, aplicando filtros por base de dados, idioma, escopo temático e qualidade científica.

Originalidade: O estudo preenche uma lacuna relevante na literatura ao abordar o conceito de sacrifício como elemento central do consumo sustentável, distinguindo entre diferentes tipos de sacrifício (por redução e comportamental), e discutindo suas implicações teóricas e práticas, algo ainda pouco explorado de forma sistemática.

Principais resultados: A maioria dos estudos analisa o sacrifício como parte inerente do consumo sustentável. Evidenciou-se que a percepção do sacrifício está associada a fatores como valores pessoais, nível de escolaridade, bem-estar subjetivo, normas sociais e senso de pertencimento. A forma como o sacrifício é enquadrado impacta diretamente a disposição para adotar comportamentos sustentáveis.

Contribuições teóricas: O trabalho amplia a compreensão conceitual do sacrifício no consumo sustentável, propõe uma tipologia conceitual, identifica perfis de consumidores dispostos a sacrificar e sugere uma agenda de pesquisa futura com proposições teóricas e questões investigativas.

Palavras-chave: Comportamento do consumidor; Sacrifício; Consumo sustentável; Comportamento Pró-ambiental; Sacrifício do consumidor.

Biografia do Autor

Agatha Moura, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

doutoranda

Salomão Alencar de Farias, UFPE

Salomão De Farias é Bacharel Em Administração de Empresas pela Universidade Estadual do Ceará (1987), mestre em Administração pela Universidade Federal da Paraíba (1991) e doutor em Administração pela Universidade de São Paulo (1998). Atualmente é Visiting Professor no Instituto de Negócios Internacionais do College of Business da Georgia State University. Professor associado da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco em licença sabática. Tem experiência na área de Administração, com ênfase em Mercadologia, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: comportamento do consumidor e negócios internacionais. Foi bolsista Fulbright Scholar in Residence em 2014, Mais recentemente, foi coordenador do PROPAD/UFPE, membro do comite de area do CNPq, editor da BAR, membro do comite cientifico de Marketing da ANPAD, parecerista CAPES, CNPQ e FACEPE

Referências

Balderjahn, I., Hoffmann, S., & Hüttel, A. (2023). How empowerment and materialism contribute to anti-consumers’ well-being. European Journal of Marketing, 57(4), 1186–1218. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-01-2021-0061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-04-2020-0284

Belk, R. W., Wallendorf, M., & Sherry Jr, J. F. (1989). The sacred and the profane in consumer behavior: Theodicy on the odyssey. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1086/209191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209191

Binder, M., & Blankenberg, A. K. (2017). Green lifestyles and subjective well-being: More about self-image than actual behavior? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 137, 304–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.03.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.03.009

Blut, M., Chaney, D., Lunardo, R., Mencarelli, R., & Grewal, D. (2023). Customer perceived value: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Service Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705231171103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705231222295

Cairns, R. D., & Martinet, V. (2014). An environmental-economic measure of sustainable development. European Economic Review, 69, 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.03.001

Chang, T. W., & Hung, C. Z. (2022). Sustainable consumption: Research on examining the influence of the psychological process of consumer green purchase intention by using a theoretical model of consumer affective events. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 8093–8120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01788-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01788-0

Chua, K. B., Quoquab, F., Mohammad, J., & Basiruddin, R. (2016). The mediating role of new ecological paradigm between value orientations and pro-environmental personal norm in the agricultural context. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 28(2), 323–349. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-09-2015-0135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-09-2015-0138

Dinter, R. V., Tekinerdogan, B., & Catal, C. (2021). Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 136, 106589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106589 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106589

Duong, C. D. (2024). Environmental corporate social responsibility initiatives and the attitude-intention-behavior gap in green consumption. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(2), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2022-0487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2022-0487

Essiz, O., Yurteri, S., Mandrik, C., & Senyuz, A. (2023). Exploring the value-action gap in green consumption: Roles of risk aversion, subjective knowledge, and gender differences. Journal of Global Marketing, 36(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2022.2141107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2022.2116376

Garcia-Rada, X., Kim, T., & Liu, P. J. (2024). Consumption sacrifice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 34(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1404

Kantenbacher, J., Hanna, P., Cohen, S., Miller, G., & Scarles, C. (2017). Public attitudes about climate policy options for aviation. Environmental Science & Policy, 81, 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.02.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.12.012

Kantenbacher, J., Hanna, P., Miller, G., Scarles, C., & Yang, J. (2019). Consumer priorities: What would people sacrifice in order to fly on holidays? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1517767 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1409230

Kim, S. (2024). Going green to repair damaged self‐concept: The interplay of self‐deficit and benefit appeals on green consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(5), 2318–2334. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2335

Krupnova, T. G., Rakova, O. V., Shefer, E. A., Semenenko, D. P., & Saifullin, A. F. (2022). Domestic energy-saving behavior index as sustainability indicator: Are Russians ready for sacrifices to protect the environment? Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 16, 100209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2022.100209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2022.100209

Lapierre, J. (2000). Customer‐perceived value in industrial contexts. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 15(2/3), 122–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620010316831 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620010316831

Le, H. P., & Ozturk, I. (2020). The impacts of globalization, financial development, government expenditures, and institutional quality on CO2 emissions in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 22680–22697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08895-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08812-2

Leclercq-Machado, L., Alvarez-Risco, A., Gómez-Prado, R., Cuya-Velásquez, B. B., Esquerre-Botton, S., Morales-Ríos, F., ... & Yáñez, J. A. (2022). Sustainable fashion and consumption patterns in Peru: An environmental-attitude-intention-behavior analysis. Sustainability, 14(16), 9965. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169965 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169965

Mahoney, S. (2011, April 25). Study: Green gap is bigger than ever. MediaPost. https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/148938/study-green-gap-is-bigger-than-ever.html

Maibach, E. W., Nisbet, M., Baldwin, P., Akerlof, K., & Diao, G. (2010). Reframing climate change as a public health issue: An exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health, 10(299), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-299

Matear, M. A. (2014). The role and nature of willingness to sacrifice in marketing relationships (Tese de doutorado). Queen’s University.

McNeill, L., & Moore, R. (2015). Sustainable fashion consumption and the fast fashion conundrum: Fashionable consumers and attitudes to sustainability in clothing choice. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(3), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12169

Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), O1–O16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695

Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84

Prinzing, M. (2023). Going green is good for you: Why we need to change the way we think about pro-environmental behavior. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 26(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2023.2190024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2020.1848192

Rahman, I. (2018). The interplay of product involvement and sustainable consumption: An empirical analysis of behavioral intentions related to green hotels, organic wines and green cars. Sustainable Development, 26(4), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1713

Rahman, O., & Kharb, D. (2022). Product choice: Does eco-labeling play an important role in apparel consumption in India? Fashion Practice, 14(2), 266–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2022.2072901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2021.2015873

Ravald, A., & Grönroos, C. (1996). The value concept and relationship marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 30(2), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569610106626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569610106626

Rydzewski, P. (2013). The implementation of sustainable development vs. environmental attitudes in international comparative studies. Problemy Ekorozwoju – Problems of Sustainable Development, 8(1), 125–137.

Tawde, S., Kamath, R., & ShabbirHusain, R. V. (2023). ‘Mind will not mind’–Decoding consumers' green intention-green purchase behavior gap via moderated mediation effects of implementation intentions and self-efficacy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 383, 135506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135506

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(45), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Tobler, C., Visschers, V. H., & Siegrist, M. (2012). Addressing climate change: Determinants of consumers' willingness to act and to support policy measures. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.001

Ur Rahman, S., Chwialkowska, A., Hussain, N., & Bhatti, W. A. (2021). Cross-cultural perspective on sustainable consumption: Implications for consumer motivations and promotion. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25, 997–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02059-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02059-8