Socio-economic factors influencing the level of welfare of the population in Central Asia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2024.v24i1.2738Palavras-chave:
Poverty, Central Asia, Vicious circle, Economic poverty model, Factors of poverty persistence, Systemic poverty, Resolution of poverty, Economic developmentResumo
The purpose of this research is to empirically analyze the dynamics of poverty in Central Asia, incorporating selected factors into a proposed model known as the vicious circle of poverty. This model illustrates a closed cycle in which the development of one factor directly influences the preservation of another, creating a complex web of interdependencies. Regression analysis, adapted to address data limitations, is employed to assess the impact of these factors on poverty. The study, conducted over 11 periods, necessitates the use of weighted ordinary least squares due to data constraints. The study encompasses 11 periods, and for some factors, ordinary least squares tools with robust error assessments prove ineffective due to limited data accuracy. As a result, the weighted ordinary least squares approach is adopted to ensure robust model quality. The research underscores that the persistence of poverty in Central Asia is rooted in systemic factors, resulting in cyclical patterns in some nations. While Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan presently lack vicious poverty circles, their vulnerability to such circles remains, requiring substantial transformations. To mitigate the risk of enduring poverty, a comprehensive approach is recommended, encompassing policy measures tailored to the most vulnerable segments of society. Proceeding from econometric modeling, the authors propose a list of recommendations to build a basis for further mitigation of the problem in Central Asian states. The proposals are made with consideration of the complicatedness and infeasibility of comprehensive and overnight solutions to the problem of poverty and are intended to launch a mechanism for the assessment of the situation and its initial resolution.
Referências
Abdurakhmanov K.H. Zokirova N.K., Islamov B., Hiwatari M. (2016) Systemic transformation and sustainable human development: the Case of Uzbekistan. Jakarta: Gunadarma Publisher, 2016, p. 230.
Abdurakhmanov K.Kh., Zokirova N.K. (2019). New challenges and priorities of the labor market development in Uzbekistan. Journal Revista Espacios. Vol. 40 (Number 10) Page 14. «ESPACIOS» №10/ Caracas, Venezuela. ISSN: 0798 1015/ Number 10, 2019
Abdulai A.M., Shamshiry E. 2014. Linking Sustainable Livelihoods to Natural Resources and Governance. New York: Springer. 198 p.
Aber L., Butler S., Danziger S. 2015. Opportunity, Responsibility, and Security a Consensus Plan for Reducing Poverty and Restoring the American Dream. Washington: Brookings Institution. 88 p.
Addae-Korankye A. 2019. Theories of Poverty: A Critical Review. Journal of Poverty, Investment and Development. №48. pp. 55-62.
Batsaikhan U., Dabrowski M. 2017. Central Asia – Twenty-Five Years after the Breakup of the USSR. Russian Journal of Economics. №3. pp. 296-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.ruje.2017.09.005
Bradshaw T.K. 2007. Theories of Poverty and Anti-Poverty Programs in Community Development. Community Development. №1. pp. 7-25. DOI: 10.1080/15575330709490182
Brady D. 2019. Theories of the Causes of Poverty. Annual Review of Sociology. №45. pp. 155-175. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022550
Chapman G. 2011. Poverty in Central Asia: Kazakhstan versus Tajikistan. Global Majority E-Journal. №1. pp. 19-30.
Cieślewska A. 2016. Transforming the Social Role of Female Religious Professionals in Tajikistan. Asian Studies Review. №4(40). pp. 510-526. DOI: 10.1080/10357823.2016.1229739
Dadabaev T., Soipov J. 2020. Craving Jobs? Revisiting Labor and Educational Migration from Uzbekistan to Japan and South Korea. Acta Via Serica. №1. pp. 111–140. DOI: 10.22679/ avs.2020.5.2.005
Davis E.P., Sanchez-Martinez M. 2014. A Review of the Economic Theories of Poverty. National institute of economic and social research. Discussion Paper №435. 65 p.
García C.E., Pabsdorf M.N., Alvarez J.C.M. 2019. Factors Determining Differences in the Poverty Degree among Countries. Resources. №8(3). pp. 1-19. DOI: 10.3390/resources8030122
Gibbon H.M.F., Nurse A.M., Hurst C.E. 2019. Social Inequality: Forms, Causes, and Consequences. London: Routledge. 424 p.
Hamidov A., Daedlow K., Webber H., Hussein H., Abdurahmanov I., Dolidudko A., Helming K. 2022. Operationalizing Water-energy-food Nexus Research for Sustainable Development in Social-ecological Systems: an Interdisciplinary Learning Case in Central Asia. Ecology & Society. №1. pp. 1-17. DOI: 10.5751/ES-12891-270112
Ildirar M., Iscan E. 2015. Corruption, Poverty and Economic Performance: Eastern Europe and Central Asia (ECA) Countries. International Conference on Eurasian Economies.
Jonbekova D. 2020. Educational Research in Central Asia: Methodological and Ethical Dilemmas in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. №3. pp. 352-370.
Jonbekova D. 2020. The Diploma Disease in Central Asia: Students' Views about Purpose of University Education in Kazakhstan and Tajikistan. Studies in Higher Education. №6. pp. 1183-1196.
Jordan G. 2004. The Causes of Poverty Cultural vs. Structural: Can There Be a Synthesis? Perspectives in Public Affairs. №2. pp. 18-34.
Lemon E. 2020. Critical Approaches to Security in Central Asia. London: Routledge. 272 p.
Matveeva A., Giustozzi A. 2018. The Central Asian Militants: Cannon Fodder of Global Jihadism or Revolutionary Vanguard? Small Wars & Insurgencies. 2(29). pp. 189-206.
McIntyre L. 2013. The Practical Skeptic: Core Concepts in Sociology. New York: McGraw Hill. 304 p.
Olufemi P. 2022. Adeyeye Community and Institutional Responses to Flood Disaster in Osogbo, Nigeria. Journal of Poverty, Investment and Development. №61. pp. 36-47.
Poverty and shared prosperity. Correcting course. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. 2022
Rank M.R. 2004. One Nation, Underprivileged: Why American Poverty Affects Us All. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 356 p.
Sameti M., Esfahani R., Haghighi H. 2012. Theories of Poverty: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Business and Management Review. №6. pp. 45-56.
Sarlo C.A. 2019. The Causes of Poverty. Vancouver: Fraser Institute. 64 p.
Spoor M. 2013. Multidimensional Social Exclusion and the ‘Rural-Urban Divide’ in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Sociologia Ruralis. №2. pp. 139-157.
Unpacking deprivation bundles to reduce multidimensional poverty. Global multidimensional poverty index 2022. United Nations Development Programme and Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative. 2022
Wang Z., Guo S. 2022. Politics of Poverty Governance: an Introduction. Journal of Chinese Political Science. №27. pp. 205-219.
Vasnetsova A.S. 2019. Vzaimosviaz terrorizma s organizovannoi prestupnostiu. [The relationship between terrorism and organized crime.] nota bene. №5. pp. 66-79.
Greene, G. 2016. Ekonometricheskii analiz. Kn. 1. [Econometric Analysis. Book 1.] G. Greene; trans. from English; scientific ed. S.S. Sinelnikov, M.IU. Turuntseva. Moscow: Delo Publishing House of the RANEPA. 760 p.
Abdurakhmanov K.KH. Iskusstvennyi intellekt – osnova ustoichivogo razvitiia ekonomiki. [Artificial Intelligence as a basis for sustainable economic development.] – Moscow: Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 2023. -432 p.
Dustmuradov O.I., Gulmurodov K.A. 2020. Uroven bednosti v Uzbekistane i puti po ego snizheniiu. [The level of poverty in Uzbekistan and ways to reduce it.] Economic Sciences. pp. 15-17.
Guidance on Modernizing Statistical Legislation. 2018. UNECE. Geneva: United Nations. 167 p.
Konarovskii M.A. 2017. Afganistan posle 2014 goda. [Afghanistan after 2014.] International Organisations Research Journal. №3. pp. 242-253.
Mirzieev S.M. Uchastnikam II Mezhdunarodnogo foruma po sokrashcheniiu bednosti. [Mirziyoyev Sh.M. To the participants of the 2nd International Forum on Poverty Reduction.] May 18, 2023. https://president.uz/ru/lists/view/6343
World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2023. International Labor Organization report. 2023
Prokhorenko I.L. 2019. Novaia strategiia Evropeiskogo soiuza v TSentralnoi Azii: vozmozhnosti i predely “miagkoi sily”. [The European Union's New Central Asia Strategy: Opportunities and Limits of "Soft Power".] Analysis and Forecasting. IMEMO Journal. №4. pp. 68-80.
Tolpykin V.E. 2011. Sistemnost kak metodologicheskii printsip sovremennoi postneklassicheskoi nauki. [Systematicity as a methodological principle of modern postneclassical science.] Theory and Practice of Social Development. №7. pp. 27-29.
Presidential Decree of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On the strategy of development of New Uzbekistan for 2022-2026". National Legislation Database, January 29, 2022, № 06/22/60/0082, March 18, 2022, № 06/22/89/0227; February 10, 2023, № 06/23/21/0085
Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated April 8, 2022 No. UP-101 “On regular reforms to create conditions for stable economic growth by improving the business environment and developing the private sector”. – https://lex.uz/ru/docs/5947782
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Gestão & Tecnologia
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Os direitos, inclusive os de tradução, são reservados. É permitido citar parte de artigos sem autorização prévia desde que seja identificada a fonte. A reprodução total de artigos é proibida. Em caso de dúvidas, consulte o Editor.