From Classical Construction to AI in Science: editorial reflections

Authors

  • José Edson Lara Fundação Pedro Leopoldo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2025.v25i3.3234

Abstract

Dear reader,

From philosophers to historians of science, the commonality of their findings and perceptions has been concerning the “modus cogitandi” and the “modus operandi”, from individual scientists or specialized research groups. The depth of the theoretical spectrum, as well as the methodological possibilities, have always been determined by human aptitude in scientific research activities. Obviously, aptitudes are determined by academic backgrounds, by the economic conditions available to laboratories, by observation and experiment niches, by the capacity to aggregate research inputs and by economic interests, which are more precisely in the case of technological research.

Author Biography

José Edson Lara, Fundação Pedro Leopoldo

Curso de Mestrado

References

References:

Condé, Mauro L. L. (2017). Um papel para a história: o problema da historicidade da ciência. Curitiba: Editora UFPR, 171 p. https://www.editora.ufpr.br/produto/320/papel-para-a-historia,-um--o-problema-da-historicidade-da-ciencia

Cozman, Fábio G.; Plonski, Guilherme A. & Neri, Hugo (2021). Inteligência Artificial: Avanços e Tendências. São Paulo: Instituto de Estudos Avançados. https://doi.org/10.11606/9786587773131

Kuhn, Thomas S. (2005). A estrutura das revoluções científicas. 9a ed. São Paulo: Perspectivas.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Lara, J. E. (2025). From Classical Construction to AI in Science: editorial reflections. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 25(3), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2025.v25i3.3234

Issue

Section

EDITORIAL