Diversificação industrial baseada na acumulação de domínio tecnológico: uma análise empírica na Iguaçu

Authors

  • Rafael Kuramoto Gonzalez UTFPR FGV

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2020.v20i2.1526

Keywords:

Domínio tecnológico, agroindústria, diversificação industrial, Brasil

Abstract

A pesquisa investiga como a acumulação de domínio tecnológico possibilitou que a Cia. Iguaçu de Café Solúvel explorasse alternativas de diversificação industrial. A literatura de inovação apresenta um desenvolvimento considerável acerca dos impactos para as organizações. Contudo, ainda encontra-se uma lacuna quando se trata de como a acumulação de domínio tecnológico gera conhecimento e abre janelas de oportunidades para diversificação industrial. Não obstante, alguns estudos consideram que indústrias baseadas na agroindústria não são capazes de gerar externalidades positivas e desenvolvimento tecnológico e industrial. Com base em uma estratégia de estudo de caso em profundidade na agroindústria do café solúvel com cobertura de longo prazo foi encontrado evidências que o processo de diversificação que a Iguaçu realizou foi resultado da acumulação de domínio tecnológico. Desta forma, a pesquisa conclui que agroindústrias podem sim exercer o papel de geradoras de inovação, tecnologia e diversificação industrial.

References

Ansoff, H I. (1958) A model for diversification. Management Science, v. 4, n. 4, p. 392.

Arnold, E; Thuriaux, B. (1997) Developing Firms’ Technological Capabilities. Report for the OECD, Brighton, Technopolis

Bell, M. & Pavitt, K. (1993) Technological accumulation and industrial growth: contrast between developed and developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 2, n. 2, p. 157-210.

Bell, M.; Pavitt, K. (1995) The Development of Technological Capabilities, In: I. U. Haque (ed.), Trade, Technology and International Competitiveness. The World Bank: Washington DC, 1995.

Bell, M. (2006) Time and technological learning in industrialising countries: how long does it take? How fast is it moving (if at all)? International Journal of Technology Management, v. 36, n. 1-3, p. 25-39

Bell, M.; Scott-Kemmis, D.; Satyarakwit, W. (1982) Limited learning in infant industry: a case study. In: Stewart, F.; James, J. (Eds.). The economics of new technology in developing countries. London: Pinter, 1982. p. 138-156.

Cavalieri, H.; Torres, R.; Hasenclever, L. (2013) Mudança estrutural e especialização produtiva: potenciais e desafios para o Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Revista Economia & Tecnologia. 9. 10.5380/ret.v9i1.30721.

Cepal. (2012) Structural Change for equality. An integrated approach to development. San Salvador: ECLAC

Cimoli, M.; Dosi, G.; Stiglitz, J. (2009) The future of industrial policies in the new millenium: toward a knowledge-centered development agenda. In: CIMOLI, M.; DOSI, G.; STIGLITZ, J. E. (Eds.). Industrial policy and development. The political economy of capabilities accumulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Dantas, E.; Bell, M. (2009) Latecomer firms and the emergence and development of knowledge networks: the case of Petrobras in Brazil. Research Policy, v. 38, p. 829-844

Dantas, E.; Bell, M. (2011) The co-evolution of firm-centered knowledge networks and capabilities in late industrializing countries: the case of Petrobras in the offshore oil innovation system in Brazil. World Development, v. 39, n. 9, p. 1570-1591

Dodgson, M., Bessant, J. (1996) Effective Innovation Policy: A New Approach, Routledge: International Thomson Business Press, 1996

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, v. 14, n. 4, p. 532-550

Ferraz, J. C.; Kupfer, D.; Iootty, M. (2004) Industrial competitiveness in Brazil: ten years after economic liberalization. CEPAL Review, n. 82, p. 91-117

Ferraz, J. C.; Souza, F. E. P.; Kupfer, D. (2010) Trayectorias para el desarrollo brasileño. Boletin Informativo Techint, n. 333.

Gonzalez, R. K.; Cunha, S. K. (2012) Internationalization process and technological capability trajectory of Iguaçu. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(2), 117–130

Gonzalez, R. K.; Cunha, S. K. (2013) Trajetória de capacidade tecnológica da Cia Iguaçu de café solúvel. Revista de Administração e Inovação, 10 (2) (abr./jun. 2013), pp. 04-28 São Paulo

Gonzalez, R. K. (2016) Processo alternativo de catch-up em indústrias intensivas em recursos naturais: Uma análise empírica da trajetória tecnológica da indústria de bioetanol de cana-de-açúcar no Brasil. Tese de Doutorado. FGV. Rio de Janeiro/RJ

Grant, R. M.; Jammine, A. (1988) P. Performance differences between the Wrigley/Rumelt strategic categories. Strategic Management Journal, v. 9, n. 4, p. 333-346, July/Aug

Grzebieluckas, C.; Marcon, R.; Bandeira-De-Melo, R.; Alberton, A. (2007) Estratégia de Diversificação: Conceitos, Motivos e Medidas. In: III Encontro de Estudos em Estratégia, São Paulo/SP, 9 a 11 de maio

Hendrikse, G.W.J.; Van Oijen, A.C.J., (2002) Diversification and Corporate Governance (23 2002 5,). ERIM Report Series Reference No. ERS-2002-48-ORG. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=370996

Iizuka, M.; Katz, J. (2010) Natural resource industries, 'tragedy of the commons' and the case of Chilean salmon farming, No 061, MERIT Working Papers, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT), https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:unm:unumer:2010061

Katz, J. (1976) Importación de tecnologia, aprendizage y industrialización dependiente. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Economica

Katz, J. (2015) Crecer a partir de recursos naturales: que hemos aprendido? Universidad do Chile

Kim, L. (1997a) The dynamics of Samsung’s technological learning in semiconductors. California Management Review, v. 39, n. 3, p. 86-100

KIM, L. (1997b) Imitation to innovation: the dynamics of Korea’s technological learning. Boston: Harvard Business School Press

KIM, L (1998) Crisis construction and organizational learning: capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science, v. 9, n. 4, p. 506-521

Lall, S. (1992) Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development, v. 20, n. 2, p. 165-186

Lee, K.; Lim, C. (2001) Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: findings from the Korean industries. Research Policy, v. 30, p. 459-483

Marin, A.; Stubrin, L. (2015) Innovation in natural resources: New opportunities and new challenges. The case of the Argentinean seed industry. UNU-MERIT, Working Paper Series, n. 15

Markides, C.; Williamson, P. (1996) Corporate Diversification and Organizational Structure: A Resource-Based View. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 340-367. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/256783

Mazzoleni, R.; Nelson, R. R. (2007) Public research institutions and economic catch-up. Research Policy, v. 36, n. 10, p. 1512-1528

Miles, M. B.; Huberman, A. M. (1994) Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage

Morris, M.; Kaplinsky, R.; Kaplan, D. (2012) One thing leads to another - Commodities, linkages and industrial development, Resources Policy, 37, issue 4, p. 408-416, https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:37:y:2012:i:4:p:408-416

Marin, A.; Navas-Alemán, L.; Perez, C. (2015) Natural resource industries as a platform for the development of knowledge intensive industries. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, v. 106, n. 2, p. 154-168

Ocampo, J. A. (2004)Structural dynamics and economic growth in developing countries. The New Scholl. Disponível em: http://www.newschool.edu/scepa/events/papers/workshop/ocampo_ 200402.pdf

OECD (1992). OECD Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data – Oslo Manual, OCDE/GD (92)26, Paris: OECD

Patton, M. Q. (1990) Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills: Sage

Perez, C. (2008) A Vision for Latin America: a Resource-Based Strategy for Technological Dynamism and Social Inclusion, Globelics Working Paper Series, No. WPG0804 (originally prepared for CEPAL)

Pérez, C. (2015) The new context for industrializing around natural resources: an opportunity for Latin America (and other resource rich countries)? Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics, Working Papers, n. 62

Pitts, R. A.; Hopkins, H. D. (982) Firm diversity: conceptualization and measurement. The Academy of Management Review, v. 7, n. 4, p. 620-629, Oct

Rumelt, R. P. (1986) Diversification in industry – United States: strategy, structure and economic performance. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Classics

Schmitz, H.; Strambach, S. (2009) The organisational decomposition of innovation and global distribution of innovative activities: insights and research agenda. Int. J. of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, v. 2, n. 4

Smith, K. (2007) Innovation and growth in resource-based economies. Australia: CEDA/Growth 58

Ville, S.; Wicken, O. (2012) The Dynamics of Resource-Based Economic Development: Evidence from Australia and Norway, Department of Economics, University of Wollongong, Working Paper 04-12, 55. http://ro.uow.edu.au/commwkpapers/241, 2012

Westphal, L. E.; Kim, L.; Dahlman, C. J. (1984) Reflections of Korea’s acquisition of technological capability. Washington, DC: World Bank Research Department, Economics and Research Staff. (Report DRD77).

Yin, R. K. (2005) Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005

Downloads

Published

2020-05-14

How to Cite

Gonzalez, R. K. (2020). Diversificação industrial baseada na acumulação de domínio tecnológico: uma análise empírica na Iguaçu. Journal of Management & Technology, 20(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2020.v20i2.1526

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 2 (2020): Abril/Junho

Section

ARTIGO

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Management & Technology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: • 1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal. • 2. The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s). • 3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s). • 4. The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA. • 5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. • 6. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. • 7. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html