Impact of Social Capital on Sharing Human Resources in Science and Technology in Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2024.v24i3.2877Palavras-chave:
Impact, social capital, sharing, human resources, VietnamResumo
This study analyzes the impact of social capital factors such as structural social capital, cognitive social capital, relational social capital, sharing behavior, sharing desire, and sharing capability on the effectiveness of sharing human resources in the field of science and technology in Vietnam. The survey was conducted using a questionnaire to collect data through convenience sampling method. The study collected 478 responses from lecturers and researchers at several universities, research centers, and institutes in Vietnam. The research hypotheses were tested using a multivariate regression model. The findings show that structural social capital, relational social capital, sharing behavior, and sharing capability positively impact the effectiveness of sharing human resources in science and technology. Based on these findings, the study proposes several solutions for developing human resources in science and technology by promoting social capital and knowledge sharing processes.
Referências
Chow, W. S. and Chan, L. S. (2008). Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information & Management, 45(7), 458-465.
Coleman, J. S. (2000). Foundations of social theory (3. print). Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press.
Communist Party of Vietnam (2011). Documents of the 11th National Party Congress. Hanoi, Vietnam: National Political Publishing House.
Do Tuan Thanh (2018). Human resources for science and technology in Vietnam today. Vietnamese Journal of Social Sciences, No. 1, 50-56.
Ganguly, A., Talukdar, A., and Chatterjee, D. (2019). Evaluating the role of social capital, tacit knowledge sharing, knowledge quality and reciprocity in determining innovation capability of an organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(6), 1105-1135.
Gerbing, D. W. and Anderson, J. C. (1988). Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 186-192.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hanifan, L. J. (1912). The rural school and rural life. West Virginia School Journal, 4, 204–207.
Heffernan, M. (2015). The secret ingredient that makes some teams better than others. https://ideas.ted.com/the-secret-ingredient-that-makes-some-teams-better-than-others/ (accessed on April 5 2024),
Hoang Trong and Chu Nguyen Mong Ngoc (2008). Analysis of research data with SPSS (Volumes 1 and 2). Hanoi, Vietnam: Hong Duc Publishing House.
Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
Nguyen Thi Huong Giang (2018). The role of social capital in the scientific and technological activities of research groups. Journal of Science and Technology Policy and Management, 8(1), 32-42.
Putnam, Robert (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
Thomas W. Malone and Michael S. Bernstein (2015). Handbook of Collective Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Uri Alon (2010). How to build a motivated research group. Molecular Cell Forum, 37(2), 151-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.011.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Gestão & Tecnologia
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Os direitos, inclusive os de tradução, são reservados. É permitido citar parte de artigos sem autorização prévia desde que seja identificada a fonte. A reprodução total de artigos é proibida. Em caso de dúvidas, consulte o Editor.
