The relationship between Ikujiro Nonaka's knowledge spiral and the six industry principles 4.0 in the context of digital transformation

Autores

  • Daniel de Souza Silva Junior ESAG-UDESC/Mestrado em Administração FAPESC/Bolsista https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6224-8082
  • Ruan Carlos dos Santos UNIVALI/Doutorando no Programa de Pós-graduação de Administração - PPGA CNPQ/Participante de Grupo de Pesquisa - GEEP (Grupo de Estudos em Estrategias e Performance) FACULDADE SÃO LUIZ - Docente na Graduação em Filosofia e Sociologia UNIASSELVI/ Professor e Tutor na Graduação em Administração e Contabilidade UNICESUMAR/ Professor na Graduação em Teologia http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7396-8774
  • Jucineia de Jesus Ferreira Souza UDESC/Graduação em Administração Pública https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1635-6891

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2021.v21i4.2145

Palavras-chave:

Digital Transformation, Industry 4.0, Knowledge Management. Ikujiro Nonaka. Strategic System.

Resumo

Purpose: The 4.0 industry is the current trend in automation and data exchange in organizations. However, to date, there is no common, generic understanding in terms of evaluation, but it is necessary to understand the main principles of Industry 4.0 and the manufacturing processes for organizations. This theoretical paper proposes a study of the relationship between Nonaka's spiral from its dimensions with the six industry 4.0 Design Principles in the context of digital transformation.

Design/methodology/approach: This research used inductive method, exploratory and descriptive research, and a bibliographic research was carried out, besides a qualitative research as field research. However, the systematic literature review methodology (SLR) of Tranfield et al. (2003) was used to ensure the replicability and transparency of the study review process.

Findings: The industrial phenomenon 4.0 that Schwab (2016) and Burke et al. (2017), called the Fourth Industrial Revolution, was guided by six design principles theorized by Hermann, Pentek and Otto (2015). As a result, a proposal for mapping organizational knowledge was presented, in the context of digitization considering the five dimensions of the knowledge spiral and the six principles of industry 4.0, which can help managers of technologies and organizational strategies in decision making. For future studies, it would be indicated the development of a study that investigates the relationship between the five dimensions of the spiral of Nonaka and its impact on management practices in companies that are in the process of digital transformation.

Originality/value: With the advances in technology and the advances of the industrial revolutions, the profile of professionals and the relationship between employees and companies were changed, a fact demonstrated in the field research, making it possible to highlight: the degree of knowledge of managers on the subject, means, the perception of what Industry 4.0 is; how organizations are already adapting to the new industrial revolution; the main challenges for this adjustment; the relevance for customers and opponents; among other findings. Ikujiro Nonaka's knowledge spiral has been an elementary theoretical basis for understanding the creation and flow of knowledge in a two-dimensional structure. Since its publication, Nonaka's model has been criticized for its viability and usability in day-to-day business. One of the criticisms is the nature of the knowledge (power, density and speed) that circulates in the organization. Another criticism is in relation to its life cycle (creation, organization, formalization, sharing and application). However, in the current context of digital transformation the emergence of industry 4.0 through digitization and digitalization the flow of intraorganizational knowledge offers a strong relationship with virtualized data exchanges.

Biografia do Autor

Daniel de Souza Silva Junior, ESAG-UDESC/Mestrado em Administração FAPESC/Bolsista

Graduação em Administração pela Faculdade AVANTIS. Especialização em Gestão Pública Municipal pelo IFSC. Mestrando em Administração pela ESAG-UDESC.

Ruan Carlos dos Santos, UNIVALI/Doutorando no Programa de Pós-graduação de Administração - PPGA CNPQ/Participante de Grupo de Pesquisa - GEEP (Grupo de Estudos em Estrategias e Performance) FACULDADE SÃO LUIZ - Docente na Graduação em Filosofia e Sociologia UNIASSELVI/ Professor e Tutor na Graduação em Administração e Contabilidade UNICESUMAR/ Professor na Graduação em Teologia

Doutorando em Administração pela UNIVALI. Mestre em Administração de Empresas pela UNIVALI. Especialista em Metodologia de Ensino de Filosofia e Sociologia pela FCV. Especialista em Gestão Empresarial pela FAPAG. Especialista em EAD e Metodologia Superior pela UNISOCIESC. Licenciatura em Filosofia e Ciências Sociais pela FAERPI.
Bacharelando em Administração pela UFSC. Bacharel em Teologia pela FACASC. Bacharel em Filosofia pela UNISUL
Membro do Grupo. Estudos de Estratégia e Performance (GEEP) do CNPQ / UNIVALI

Jucineia de Jesus Ferreira Souza, UDESC/Graduação em Administração Pública

Graduação em Logística pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, PUC Minas. Graduação em andamento em Administração Pública pela Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, UDESC,

Referências

Bauernhansl, T., Hompel, M. T., & Heuser, B. V. (2014) Industrie 4.0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik. Springer Vieweg: Munique, 2014.

Bordeleau, F., Mosconi, E., & Santa-Eulalia, L. A. de. (2019). Business intelligence and analytics value creation in Industry 4.0: a multiple case study in manufacturing medium enterprises. Production Planning & Control, v. 30. Doi: 10.1080/09537287.2019.1631458

Bratianu, C. (2010). A Critical Analysis of Nonaka’s Model of Knowledge Dynamics. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 8 n. 2, p.193 – 200.

Brecher, C., Behnen, D., Brumm, M., Carl, C.; Ecker, C., Herfs, W., Klement, R., Königs, M., Komma, T.; Lohse, W., Malik, A., Müller, S., & Özdemir, D. (2014). Virtualisierung und Vernetzung in Produktions systemen. In: Brecher, C. Integrative Produktion: Industrie 4.0. Aachener Perspektiven. Tagungsb and Aachener Werkzeugmaschinen kolloquium AWK, 22. bis 23. Mai 2014, Aachen: Shaker.

Burke, R., Mussomeli, A., Laaper, S., Hartigan, M., & Sniderman, B. (2017). The Smart Factory: Responsive, Adaptive, connected manufacturing. Deloitte University Press.

Cheng, C., Guelfirat, T., Messinger, C., Schmitt, J., Schnelte, M., & Weber, P. (2015). Semantic Degrees for Industrie 4.0: Deciding on the degree of semantic formalization to select appropriate Technologies. ABB Corporate Research, v. 15, n. 6, pp. 128-139.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, Technology, Organizations, and Innovation, v.35, n.1, Mar., p.128-152.

Cruzara, G., Sandri, E., Cherobim, A., & Frega, J. (2021). The value at the industry 4.0 and the digital transformation process: evidence from Brazilian small enterprises. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 21(1), 117-141.

Diogo, R. A., Kolbe Junior, A., & Santos, N. (2019). A transformação digital e a gestão do conhecimento: contribuições para a melhoria dos processos produtivos e organizacionais. P2P E INOVAÇÃO, v. 5, n. 2, p. 154-175, mar.

Feng, S. C., Bernstein, W. Z., Hedberg, T., & Feeney, A. B. (2017). Towards Knowledge Management for Smart Manufacturing, ASME Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 17(3), p. 03-16.

Filipov, V., & Vasilev, P. (2016). Manufacturing Operations Management - The smart backbone of industry 4.0. In: Scientific Proceedings and International Scientific Conference "Industry 4.0", XXIV, Vol. 1, p. 71-76.

Gašová, M., Gašo, M., & Štefánik, A. (2017). Advanced Industrial Tools of Ergonomics Based on Industry 4.0 Concept. Procedia engineering, v. 192, p. 219-224.

Goldman, F. L. (2017). Revisando Nonaka e Takeuchi: a inovação vista como criação de conhecimento organizacional. Revista de Ciência, tecnologia e inovação, n.2, abr.

Ghobakhloo, M. (2018). The future of manufacturing industry: a strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 29, n. 6, pp. 910-936, 2018. Doi: 10.1108/JMTM-02-2018-0057.

Habib, M. K., & Chimsom, C. I. (2019). Industry 4.0: Sustainability and design principles. In: 20th International Conference on Research and Education in Mechatronics, Wels: Austria. Doi: 10.1109/REM.2019.8744120

Hendriks, P. (1999). Why Share Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on the Motivation for Knowledge Sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, v.6, n.2 p 91–100.

Hermann, M., Pentek, T., & Otto, B. (2016). Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios. In: 49 th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, 2016, pp. 3928-3937. Doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2016.488.

Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019). The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research, v.3, n.57, pp. 829-846.

Jannuzzi, C. S. C., Falsarella, O. M., & Sugahara, C. R. (2016). Gestão do conhecimento: um estudo de modelos e sua relação com a inovação nas organizações. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, v. 21, p. 97-118.

Kamp, B., Ochoa, A., & Diaz, J. (2017). Smart servitization within the context of industrial user supplier relationships: contingencies according to a machine tool manufacturer. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), v. 11, n. 3, p. 651-663.

Kotynkova, M. (2017). Re-Industrialization of Europe: Industry 4.0 and the Future of Work. European Scientific Journal, v. 7881, n. April, p. 249–256.

Kroll, H., Horvat, D., & Jäger, A. (2018). Effects of Automatisation and Digitalisation on Manufacturing Companies' Production Efficiency and Innovation Performance. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis, n.58, Feb., Karlsruhe.

Kusiak, A. (2018). Smart Manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, v. 56, n. 1–2, 508–517, jan.

Laugsand, E. E. (2017). Industry 4.0: New Technologies and Potential for Increased Value Creation. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Available at <https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2955/935c9d8e2b81d559504c4fd2a51597c57c3d.pdf> accessed at 01 abr. 2020.

Lotti Oliva, F. (2014). Knowledge management barriers, practices and maturity model. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 18, n. 6, p. 1053–1074.

Lu, Y. (2017) Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, v. 6, p. 1–10, 2017.

Lin, Y., Ieromonachou, P., & Sun, W. (2016). Smart Manufacturing and Supply Chain Management. Business School, Londres: University of Greenwich.

Madsen, D. O. (2019). The Emergence and Rise of Industry 4.0 Viewed through the Lens of Management Fashion Theory. Adm. Sci., n.9, v.3. Doi: 10.3390/admsci9030071

Marques, M., Agostinho, C., Zacharewicz, G., & Goncalves, R. (2017). Decentralized decision support for intelligent manufacturing in Industry. JAISE - Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, IOS Press, v. 9, n. 3, p. 299-313.

Mittal, S., Khan, M.A., Romero, D., Wuest, T. (2019). Smart manufacturing: Characteristics, technologies and enabling factors. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, v. 233, n.5, pp. 1342-1361.

Mohajan, H. (2017). The Impact of Knowledge Management Models for the Development of Organizations. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, v. 5, n. 1, p. 12-33.

Morais, R., & Monteiro, R. (2019). An Assay On The Impact of Industry 4.0 in The Operations Area. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 4(2), 43-50. Doi: 10.26668/businessreview/2019.v4i2.134.

Muller, J. M., Buliga, O., & Voigt, K. (2020). The role of absorptive capacity and innovation strategy in the design of industry 4.0 business Models-A comparison between SMEs and large enterprises, European Management Journal, 2020. Doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2020.01.002.

Nadae, J., & Monteiro de Carvalho, M. (2017). A knowledge management perspective of the project management office. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(3), 350-362.

Nissen, M. (2014). Marine Forces Reserve: accelerating knowledge flow through asynchronous learning technologies. Dudley Knox Library. Monterey. Available at < https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/36736837.pdf> accessed at 15 de abr. 2020.

Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long range planning, v. 33, n. 1, p. 5-34.

Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge management research & practice, v. 1, n. 1, p. 2-10.

Nonaka, I. (2007). The Knownledge-Creating Company. Harvard Business Review, jul-aug.

Nonaka, I., Von Krogh, G., & Voelpel, S. (2006). Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory: Evolutionary Paths and Future Advances. Organization Studies, 27(8), p. 1179–1208. Doi: 10.1177/0170840606066312

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. Gestão do conhecimento. Trad. Ana Thorell. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2008.

Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, n.1, p.2-10.

North, K., & Kumta, G. (2018). Knowledge Management: value Creation Through Organizational Learning. 7. ed. Suíças: Springer.

Nowacki, R., & Bachnik, K. (2016). Innovations within knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69, pp. 1577-1581.

Nuvolari, A. (2004). The Making of Steam Power Technology: A study of Technology Change the British Industrial Revolution. Doctoral Thesis. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Inglaterra, UK.

Odenbach, J., Göll, E., & Behrendt, S. (2017). ARBEITSPAPIER: Industrie 4.0 – digital-vernetzte dezentrale Produktion. Berlin: IZT - Institut für Zukunftsstudien und Technologiebewertung gemeinnützige GmbH.

Oesterreich, T. D., & Teuteberg, F. (2016). Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Computers in Industry, 83, 121–139. Doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2016.09.006.

Oztemel, E., & Gursev, S. (2018). Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related Technologies. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, v.31 (3), p.127-182. Doi: 10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8.

Peters, M. A. (2016). Technological unemployment: Educating for the fourth industrial Revolution. Educational Philosophy and Theory, n. 49, v.1, 2016. Doi: 10.1080/00131857.2016.1177412

Philipson, S., & Kjellström, E. (2020). When objects are talking: How tacit knowing becomes explicit knowledge. Journal of Small Business Strategy, v. 30, n.1, p. 68-82.

Rezende, J. F., Pereira, R. D., & Oliveira, D. A. (2016). Plataformas para gestão do conhecimento: estudo de caso sobre a ativação do valor de excedentes cognitivos por meio do desenvolvimento de um contexto capacitante virtual. Perspectivas em Gestão & Conhecimento, v. 6, n. 1, p. 72-88.

Roblek, V., Mesko, M., & Krapez, A. (2016). A Complex View of Industry 4.0. Sage Journals, v.6, n.2,

Sabeti, M., Hashemzadeh, G., Gelard, P., & Rabiei, M. (2020). Designing a knowledge based technology transfer model using the fourth generation approach in the automotive industry. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 20, 106-125.

Santos, I. L. dos, Santos, R. C. dos, Silva Junior, D. de S. (2019). Análise da Indústria 4.0 como Elemento Rompedor na Administração de Produção. Future Studies Research Journal - Future, v. 11, p. 48-64.

Schniederjans, D. G., Curado, C., & Khalajhedayati, M. (2020). Supply chain digitisation trends: An integration of knowledge management. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 220.

Schrauf, S., & Berttram, P. (2016). Industry 4.0: How digitization makes the supply chain more efficient, agile, and customer-focused. Strategyand PWC.

Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means, how to respond. Published in < https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution> accessed in 20 jan. 2020.

Silva Junior, D., Santos, R., & Santos, I. (2020). Industry Innovations 4.0 Process Management in the Provision of Services in the Construction Industry. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies, 12(3). Doi: https://doi.org/10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2020.v12i3.500

Silveira Gontijo, T., & Motta Alves, F. (2019). A Bibliometric study on Industry 4.0. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 4(2), 35-42. Doi: 10.26668/businessreview/2019.v4i2.112.

Synnes, E. L., & Welo, T. (2016). Enhancing Integrative Capabilities through Lean Product and Process Development. Procedia CIRP, v. 54, p. 221-226.

Stocker, A. et al. (2014). Mensch-zentrierte IKT-Lösungen in einer Smart Factory. Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, v. 131, n. 7, p. 207-211.

Spath, D., Ganschar, O., Gerlach, S., Hämmerle, M., Krause, T., & Schlund, S. (2013). Produktionsarbeit der Zukunft – Industrie 4.0. Zurick: FRAUNHOF IAO.

Thoben, K., Wiesner, S., & Wuest, T. (2017). Industrie 4.0” and Smart Manufacturing – A Review of Research Issues and Application Examples. International Journal of Automation Technology. v.11, n.1. jan.

Tsoukas, H. (2002). Introduction: Knowledge-Based Perspectives on Organizations: Situated Knowledge, Novelty, and Communities of Practice. Management learning, v.33, n.4, p.419-426.

Wang, L., & Wang, G. (2016). Big Data in Cyber-Physical Systems, Digital Manufacturing and Industry 4.0. I.J. Engineering and Manufacturing, v.4, jul., p.1-8, 2016.

WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM – WEF. (2017). System Initiative on shaping the Future of Production: Impact of the Fourth Industrial Revolution on Supply Chains. EUA: WEF.

WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM – WEF. (2019). Fourth Industrial Revolution Beacons of Technology and Innovation in Manufacturing. EUA: WEF.

Yao, X., Zhou, J., Zhang, J., & Boer, C. R. (2017). From Intelligent Manufacturing to Smart Manufacturing for Industry 4.0 Driven by Next Generation Artificial Intelligence and Further On. In: 5th Internacional Conference on Enterprise Systems, set., p.311-318.

Xu, M., David, J. M., & Kim, S. H. (2018). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Opportunities and Challenges. International Journal of Financial Research, v.9, n. 2. Doi: 10.5430/ijfr.v9n2p90

Zuehlke, D. (2010). Smart Factory-Towards a factory-of-things. Annual Reviews in Control, v.34, n.1, p. 129-138, 2010. DOI:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2010.02.008.

Downloads

Publicado

2021-12-22

Como Citar

Silva Junior, D. de S., Santos, R. C. dos, & Souza, J. de J. F. (2021). The relationship between Ikujiro Nonaka’s knowledge spiral and the six industry principles 4.0 in the context of digital transformation. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 21(4), 135–161. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2021.v21i4.2145