Gestão de Risco e Desempenho de Projetos Complexos: O Grid das Competências
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2012.v12i3.492Keywords:
projetos complexos, gestão de riscos em projetos, desempenhoAbstract
Mesmo sabendo que projetos complexos exigem esforços significativos em atividades de gestão de risco acredita-se que gerentes de projetos ainda não dominam essa competência. O propósito deste trabalho foi entender como a aplicação da competência de gestão de risco pode influenciar os resultados de projetos complexos. A pesquisa, apoiada no método do estudo de caso, examinou a gestão de risco e desempenho de três empresas atuando em projetos complexos do setor de infraestrutura. O material coletado foi obtido por meio de documentos e da aplicação de entrevistas com gerentes e membros de equipe de projetos. Foi possível construir um grid de competências, além de realizar uma avaliação de cada uma delas e elaborar um quadro de proposições de ordem prática a ser utilizado por gerentes de riscos em projetos complexos. Uma limitação evidente deu-se pelo número de projetos avaliados que constituíram uma amostra não probabilística com aplicação de entrevistas baseadas na percepção dos respondentes. O trabalho originalmente integra a visão de práticas de gerenciamento de riscos com desempenho em projetos complexos, servindo de base para novos estudos.References
Baccarini, D. (1996). The concept of complexity - A review. International Journal of Project Management , 14 (4), pp. 201-204.
Chapman, S & Ward S. (2003) , Processes Techinics & Insigths. (2ª ed). John Willey and Son, Chichester, West Sussex, England.
Choundry, R. M., Fang, D., & Mohamed, S. (2007 dezembro). The nature of safety culture: A survey of the state-of-the-art. Safety Science , 45 (10), pp. 993-1012.
Cleland, D. I., & King. (1993). Project management handbook. New York: Van Nostrand Rein.
Dingsdag, D. P., Bigs, H. C., & Sheahan, V. L. (2008 abril). Understanding and defining OH&S competency for construction site positions: Worker perceptions. Safety Science , 46 (4), pp. 619-633.
Drejer, A. (2001). How can we define and define competenciaes and their develepment. Technovation , 21, pp. 135-146.
El-Mashaleh, M. S., Rababeh, S. M., & Hyary, K. H. (2010 jan). Utilizing data envelopment analysis to benchmark safety performance of construction contractors. International Journal of Project Management, , v. 28 ( n. 1), pp. 61-67.
Field, A. (2009). Descobrindo a Estatística Usando o SPSS. Porto Alegre: Editora Artmed.
Ghosh, S., & Jintanapakanont, J. (2004). Identifying and assessing the critical risk factors in an underground rail project in Thailand: a factor analysis approach. International Journal of Project Management , 22.
Ibbs, C. W., & Kwak, Y. H. (2000). Assessing Project management maturity. Project Management Journal , 31 (1), pp. 32-43.
IPMA. (2006). ICB - IPMA Competence Basiline version 3.0. Nijkerk: International Project Management Association.
Ismail, Z., Doodstar, S., & Harun, Z. (2012). Factors influencing the implementation of a safety management system for construction sites. Safety Science , 50, pp. 418-423.
Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., Huang, J., & Hung, S. Y. (2004). n exploration of the relationship between software development process and project performance. Information & Managemnt , 41.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979 mar). Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica , 263-292.
Laitinen, H., & Ruohomäki, I. (1996 out). The effects of feedback and goal setting on safety performance at two construction sites. Safety Science, v. 24 ( n. 1), pp. 61-73.
Ng, S. T., Cheng, K. P., & Skidmore, R. M. (2005). A framework for evaluating the safety performance of construction contractors. Building and Environment , 40, pp. 1347–1355.
PMI. (2007). Construction Extension to the PMBOK Guide Third Edition (Project Management Institute) (2a ed.). Newton Square, Pennsylvania, USA: Project Management Institute, Inc.
PMI. (2004). PMBoK - Project Management Body of Knowlodges Third Edition. Newton Square: Project Management Institute, Inc.
Rabechini Jr., R. (2011). O Gerente de Projetos na Empresa (3ª ed., Vol. 1). São Paulo, SP, Brasil: Editora Atlas S.A.
Rassmussen, J. (1997). Risk management ina a dinamic society: A modelling problem. Safety Science , 27 (2), pp. 183-213.
Raz, T., Shenhar, A., & Dvir, D. (2002). Risk management, project sucess and technological uncertainty. R&D Management , 32 (2).
Reason, J. (1997). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Farnham, Surrey, Englad: Ashgate Publishibg Ltd.
Saurin, T. A. (2000). Segurança no Trabalho em um Canteiro
de Obras : Percepções dos Operários e da Gerência. Proceedings of the 2002 System Dynamics Conference, 10, pp. 5-17.
Sauser, B. J., Reilly, R. R., & Shenhar, A. J. (2009). Why projects fail ? How contingency theory can provide new insights - A comparative analysis of NASA´s Mars Climate Orbiter loss. International Journal of Project Management , 27, pp. 665-679.
Teo, E. A., Ling, F. Y., & Chong, A. F. (2005. йил maio). Framework for project managers to manage construction safety. International Journal of Project Management , v. 23 (n. 4), pp. 329-341.
Theóphilo, C. R., & Martins, G. A. (2009). Metodologia da investigação científica para ciências sociais aplicadas. São Paulo: Editora Atlas S.A.
Wallace, L., Keil, M., & Rai, A. (2004). How software project risks affects project performance: A investigation of the dimensions of risk and an exploratory model. Decision Sciences , 35 (2), pp. 289-320.
Willians, T. (2002). Modelling Complex Projects (1a. Edição ed.). Chinchester, West Sussex, UK: John Willey & Sons.
Yin, R. K. (2001). Estudo de caso : Planejamento e métodos. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Revista Gestão & Tecnologia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: • 1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal. • 2. The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s). • 3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s). • 4. The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA. • 5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. • 6. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. • 7. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html