The methodology for the multi-projection analysis of sustainable development of the regions of the northern sea route

Authors

  • Sergey Mityakov Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University n.a. R.E. Alekseev, Russia
  • Dmitry Lapaev Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University n.a. R.E. Alekseev, Russia
  • Pavel Zakharov Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University n.a. R.E. Alekseev, Russia
  • Zhanna Zakharova Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University n.a. R.E. Alekseev, Russia
  • Olga Mityakova Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University n.a. R.E. Alekseev, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2023.v23i0.2753

Keywords:

Multi-projection analysis, region, sustainable development, the Northern Sea Route, logistics infrastructure, sea freight

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to develop the methodology for the multi-projection analysis of sustainable development of the regions of the Northern Sea Route, as well as its approbation according to statistical indicators for 2019-2021. The author's system of indicators contains three projections in accordance with the principles of ESG: the projection of the economy, the projection of the environment and the social projection. The methodological approach proposed in the paper includes seven stages, which are highlighted to reflect the specifics of each region. In the course of the study, the software package for the multicriteria benchmarking analysis of economic systems developed by the authors was used, which includes software and graphical implementation of algorithms for finding the effective set and ranking solutions for n criteria of optimization. The article tested the declared methodology according to the statistical data of the regions of the Northern Sea Route for 2019-2021. The proposed methodology can be effectively used in the practical activities of government bodies to ensure the proper level of socio-economic development of the regions of the Northern Sea Route.

the methodology for the multi-projection analysis of sustainable development of the regions of the northern sea route

References

Antrushina, D.R. (2022). Northern Sea Route: Opportunities and Prospects. Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow, 12(1-1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2022.56.16.002

Batkovsky, A.M. (ed.). (2021). Managing the diversification of production at the enterprises of the military-industrial complex: monograph. Moscow: OntoPrint.

Borduchenko, Yu. L., Malygin, I. G., Kaminsky, V. Yu., Aksenov, V. A. (2021). Nuclear icebreaker fleet of Russia in the first quarter of the 21st century. Tasks and prospects for the development of the Northern Sea Route. Marine Intelligent Technologies, 2-1(52), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.37220/MIT.2021.52.2.001

Bychkova, V. A. (2022). Prospects for the integrated development of the Far East region associated with the implementation of projects of the Northern Sea Route. Economics and Entrepreneurship, 10(147), 477-482. https://doi.org/10.34925/EIP.2022.147.10.090

Černevičienė, J., and Kabašinskas, A. (2022). Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Finance Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.827584

Chowdhury, P., & Paul, S. K. (2020, March 13). Applications of MCDM methods in research on corporate sustainability: A systematic literature review. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31-2, 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2019-0284.

Denisov, V.V., Svetlova, M.V. (2021). Assessment of the territorial development of the subjects of Russia on the western section of the Northern Sea Route. Bulletin of the Voronezh State University. Series: Geography. Geoecology, 1, 37-44. https://doi.org/10.17308/geo.2021.1/3254

Doukas, H., Nikas, A. (2019). Decision Support Models in Climate Policy. European Journal of Operational Research, 280-1, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ejor.2019.01.017

Doumpos, M., Grigoroudis, E. (2013). Multicriteria decision aid and artificial intelligence : links, theory and applications. Wiley-Blackwell.

Faikov, D.Yu., Faikova, E.D. (2021). Features of socio-economic development of territories in the zone of the Northern Sea Route in the logic of ongoing investment and infrastructure projects. Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law, 11(4), 875-894. https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.11.4.111916

Govindan, K., & Jepsen, M. B. (2016, April 1). ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 250, 11-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.019

Gribanova, G.I., Magdalyuk, A.V. (2022). Japan's Arctic Strategy and Russia's National Interests. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics, 16-2, 148-157. https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2022-02-148-157

Kabašinskas, A., Maggioni, F., Šutienė, K., & Valakevičius, E. (2019). A multistage risk-averse stochastic programming model for personal savings accrual: the evidence from Lithuania. Annals of Operations Research, 279(1–2), 43–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3100-z

Karpovich, O.G., Shlafman, A.I. (2020). The place and role of the Northern Sea Route in the formation and development of international economic relations in the context of expanding the economic potential of the regions. Russian Journal of Management, 8-1, 21-25. https://doi.org/10.29039/2409-6024-2020-8-1-21-25

Khan, S. A., Chaabane, A., Dweiri, F. T. (2018). MultiCriteria Decision-Making Methods Application in Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Review. InTechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74067.

Khorev, A.M. (2020). The Northern Sea Route: Necessity and Prospects for the Transit of Natural Resources. Interactive Science, 7(53), 92-97.

Kolzina, A.L., Mindubaeva, A.A. (2020). The Polar Silk Road as a sphere of strategic partnership between the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China. Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Sociology. Political science. International relationships, 4-2, 186-195. https://doi.org/10.35634/2587-9030-2020-4-2-186-195.

Lapaev, D.N. (2010). Multicriteria decision making in economics. Nizhny Novgorod: Volzh. state eng.-ped. un-t.

Lapaev, D.N., Mityakov, E.S., Kornev, E.A. (2014). Program complex for multi-criteria comparative analysis of economic systems. Economics, statistics and informatics. Vestnik UMO, 6(2), 466-469.

Lapaeva, O.N. (2015). Multi-criteria assessment of the economic state of enterprises and industries and the choice of preferred alternatives: monograph. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod. state tech. university n.a. R.E. Alekseev.

Lapaeva, O.N. (2017). Multiprojective comparative assessment of alternatives in the economy: monograph. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod. state tech. university n.a. R.E. Alekseev.

Lapaeva, O.N. (2018). Multiprojective assessment of the state of industrial economic systems: monograph. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod. state tech. university n.a. R.E. Alekseev.

Macharis, C., Bernardini, A. (2015). Reviewing the use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the evaluation of transport projects: Time for a multi-actor approach. Transport Policy, 37-1, 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tranpol.2014.11.002

Marqués, A. I., García, V., & Sánchez, J. S. (2020, September 1). Ranking-based MCDM models in financial management applications: analysis and emerging challenges. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13748-020-00207-1

Mazurchuk, T. M. (2023). Economic prospects for the development of coking coal in the Arctic regions of Russia. Economic systems, 16(1), 130-137. https://doi.org/10.29030/2309-2076-2023-16-1-130-137

Myaskov, A.V., Petrov, I.V., Zaytsev, V.S., Shmelev, V.S. (2018). Systemic features of environmental monitoring in the formation of territorial projects of the northern sea route. Monitoring. Science and technology, 5, 7-14. https://doi.org/10.25714/MNT.2018.38.001

Nikulin, M.A. (2019). Great-power competition in the Arctic: geopolitical rivalry in the new political space, In: Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: International relations, 19-3, 392-403. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-3-392-403

Pareto, V. (2017). Transformation of democracy: [trans. from Italian]. Moscow: INFRA-M.

Perova, J. P., Grigoriev, V. P., & Zhukov, D. O. (2023). Models and methods for analyzing complex networks and social network structures. Russian Technological Journal, 11(2), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.32362/2500-316x-2023-11-2-33-49

Saaty, T. L., Vargas, L. G., & Dellmann, K. (2003). The allocation of intangible resources: The analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 37(3), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(02)00039-3

Sazonov, S.L. (2021). On some aspects of the Arctic transit - a view from China. East Asia: Facts and Analytics, 4, 36-45. https://doi.org/10.24412/2686-7702-2021-4-36-45

Stojčić, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., & Mardani, A. (2019, March 1). Application of MCDM methods in sustainability engineering: A literature review 2008-2018. Symmetry, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11030350

Ushakova E.G. (2021). Arctic Frontier: Ice Silk Road and Its Role in China’s Advance to the Arctic. Arctic and North, (43), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.43.128

Valentinova, P. S., & Vorotnikov, A. M. (2021). Problems and prospects of the "green" development of the Northern Sea Route. Arktika 2035: topical issues, problems, solutions, 1(5), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.51823/74670_2021_1_4

Valipour, A., Sarvari, H., & Tamošaitiene, J. (2018). Risk assessment in ppp projects by applying different mcdm methods and comparative results analysis. Administrative Sciences, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8040080

Veselova, D. N. (2022). Main Directions of Cooperation between the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China in the Arctic. Administrative Consulting, (12), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-12-42-61

Wang, J. J., Jing, Y. Y., Zhang, C. F., & Zhao, J. H. (2009, December). Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021

Wątróbski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Karczmarczyk, A., & Zioło, M. (2019). Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection. Omega (United Kingdom), 86, 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.07.004

Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2011). Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: An overview. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(2), 397–427. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.593291 .

Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., & Chatterjee, P. (2018, December 23). Multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques for business processes information management. Information (Switzerland). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10010004

Zhuleva, O.I., Kuzmenkova, V.N. (2020). Substantiation of the strategic importance of the Northern Sea Route by analyzing the logistic and geopolitical aspects of its prospective functioning. Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law, 5-2, 295-299. https://doi.org/10.17513/vaael.1142

Downloads

Published

2023-06-13

How to Cite

Mityakov, S., Lapaev, D., Zakharov, P., Zakharova, Z., & Mityakova, O. (2023). The methodology for the multi-projection analysis of sustainable development of the regions of the northern sea route. Journal of Management & Technology, 23, 309–337. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2023.v23i0.2753

Issue

Vol. 23 (2023): Número Especial

Section

ARTIGO

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Management & Technology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: • 1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal. • 2. The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s). • 3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s). • 4. The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA. • 5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. • 6. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. • 7. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html