Gestão de riscos na abordagem ágil e o sucesso de projetos

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2023.v23i1.2319

Keywords:

Gerenciamento de riscos, ágil, gerenciamento de projeto, sucesso de projetos, tipologia de projetos.

Abstract

Resumo

 

Objetivo: O objetivo deste trabalho é investigar a relação entre o gerenciamento de riscos e o sucesso de projetos gerenciados por abordagens ágeis, suportando a análise das lacunas identificadas na literatura, no que tange ao incipiente gerenciamento de riscos de projetos gerenciados por abordagens ágeis, assim como a existência de poucos estudos envolvendo esses temas.

 

Metodologia: A abordagem metodológica utilizada foi de natureza quantitativa, sendo validada por meio de um questionário online tipo survey, com a aplicação de modelagem de equações estruturais.

 

Originalidade: A gestão de risco e as abordagens ágeis têm exercido influências positivas nos resultados dos projetos e assim, despertado interesse nos mais diversos stakeholders no campo da disciplina de gestão de projetos. No entanto, a relação entre elas ainda é um fenômeno pouco explorado na literatura especializada em gestão de projetos.

 

Principais resultados: Os resultados dos testes estatísticos confirmaram a influência do gerenciamento de riscos no sucesso de projetos gerenciados por abordagens ágeis, assim como também confirmaram que a partir de um determinado nível de complexidade, os projetos requerem um gerenciamento de riscos mais robusto e eficaz.

 

Contribuições teóricas: Além de contribuições práticas para as organizações, os resultados deste estudo proporcionam novas possibilidades de estudos na área de ciências sociais aplicadas e fortalecem a relação entre o gerenciamento de riscos e o sucesso de projetos.

 

Palavras-chave: Gerenciamento de riscos, ágil, gerenciamento de projeto, sucesso de projetos, tipologia de projetos.

Author Biographies

Pedro Jose Martins Alvarez Fernandes

Mestre em Administração pela Universidade Nove de Julho – UNINOVE. São Paulo, SP – Brasil.

Roque Rabechini Jr.

Pós-doutor em Administração pela Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo - FEA/USP.  São Paulo, SP – Brasil

References

REFERÊNCIAS

Alharbi, E., & Qureshi, M. R. (2014). Implementation of Risk Management with SCRUM to Achieve CMMI Requirements. International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security (IJCNIS), 6, 20–25. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijcnis.2014.11.03

Bakker, K., Boonstra, A., & Wortmann, H. (2010). Does risk management contribute to IT project success? A meta-analysis of empirical evidence. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.07.002

Bido, D. de S., & Silva, D. da. (2019). SmartPLS 3: Especificação, estimação, avaliação e relato. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, 20(2), 488–536. https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2019.v20n2.1545

Boehm, B. (2000). Requirements that handle IKIWISI, COTS, and rapid change. Computer, 33(7), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.869384

Boehm, B. (2002). Get ready for agile methods, with care. Computer, 35(1), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.976920

Boehm, B., & Turner, R. (2003). Using risk to balance agile and plan-driven methods. Computer, 36(6), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2003.1204376

Bumbary, K. (2016). Using Velocity, Acceleration, and Jerk to Manage Agile Schedule Risk (p. 80). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISE.2016.21

Carvalho, M. M. de. (2009). Inovação: Estratégias e comunidades de conhecimento.

Carvalho, M. M. de, & Rabechini Jr., R. (2014). Impact of risk management on project performance: The importance of soft skills. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.919423

Chow, T., & Cao, D.-B. (2008). A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects. Journal of Systems and Software, 81(6), 961–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2007.08.020

Crawford, L., Hobbs, B., & Turner, J. R. (2006). Aligning Capability with Strategy: Categorizing Projects to do the Right Projects and to do Them Right. Project Management Journal, 37(2), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280603700205

Creswell, J. W. (2010). PROJETO DE PESQUISA - METODOS QUALITATIVO, QUANTITATIVO E MISTO: Métodos Qualitativo, Quantitativo e Misto (Edição: 3a). Penso.

Dingsøyr, T., Moe, N., Fægri, T., & Amdahl Seim, E. (2018). Exploring software development at the very large-scale: A revelatory case study and research agenda for agile method adaptation. Empirical Software Engineering, 23, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9524-2

Dvir, D., Lipovetsky, S., Shenhar, A., & Tishler, A. (1998). In search of project classification: A non-universal approach to project success factors. Research Policy, 27(9), 915–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00085-7

Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008). Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 50(9), 833–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006

Fernandes, P. J. M. A., & Rabechini Jr., R. (2020). Um estudo dos fatores críticos de sucesso em projetos de TI gerenciados por abordagens ágeis em uma instituição financeira. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 20(4), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2020.v20i4.1939

Fernandes, P. J. M. A., & Rabechini Jr., R. (2021). O gerenciamento de riscos em projetos gerenciados por abordagens ágeis: Uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Revista de Gestão e Projetos, 12(1), 172–194. https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v12i1.17817

Fortune, J., & White, D. (2006). Framing of project critical success factors by a systems model. International Journal of Project Management, 24(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.07.004

Freitas, H., Oliveira, M., Saccol, A. Z., & Moscarola, J. (2000). O método de pesquisa survey. Revista de Administração, 35(3), 105-112. http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/16542/o-metodo-de-pesquisa-survey

Gusmão, C. M. G. de, & Moura, H. P. de. (2003). ISO, CMMI and PMBOK Risk Management: A Comparative Analysis. The International Journal of Applied Management and Technology, 1. https://docplayer.net/9143777-Iso-cmmi-and-pmbok-risk-management-a-comparative-analysis.html

Hair Jr., J., Hult, G. T., & Ringle, C. (2016). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (Edição: 2). Sage Publications.

Hammad, M., Inayat, I., & Zahid, M. (2019). Risk Management in Agile Software Development: A Survey. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIT47737.2019.00039

Highsmith, J., & Cockburn, A. (2001). Agile software development: The business of innovation. Computer, 34(9), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.947100

Hobbs, B., & Petit, Y. (2017). Agile Methods on Large Projects in Large Organizations. Project Management Journal, 48(3), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281704800301

Jugdev, K., & Müller, R. (2005). A Retrospective look at our Evolving Understanding of Project Success. Project Management Journal, 36(4), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280503600403

Kendra, K., & Taplin, L. J. (2004). Project Success: A Cultural Framework. Project Management Journal, 35(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280403500104

Mousaei, M., & Javdani, T. (2018). A New Project Risk Management Model based on Scrum Framework and Prince2 Methodology. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2018.090461

Parameswaran, R., & Yaprak, A. (1987). A Cross-National Comparison of Consumer Research Measures. Journal of International Business Studies, 18, 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490398

Rabechini Jr., R., & Carvalho, M. M. de. (2013). Relationship between risk management and project success. Production, 23(3), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132012005000091

Rabechini Jr., R., & Carvalho, M. (2009a). Gestão projetos inovadores em uma perspectiva contingencial: Análise teórico-conceitual e proposição de um modelo. INMR - Innovation & Management Review, 6(3), 63–78.

Rabechini Jr., R., & Carvalho, M. M. (2009b). Gestão projetos inovadores em uma perspectiva contingencial: Análise teórico-conceitual e proposição de um modelo. INMR - Innovation & Management Review, 6(3), 63–78.

Ringle, C., Silva, D., & Bido, D. (2014). STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING WITH THE SMARTPLS. Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 13, 56–73.

Ropponen, J., & Lyytinen, K. (1997). Can software risk management improve system development: An exploratory study. European Journal of Information Systems, 6(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000253

Ropponen, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2000). Components of software development risk: How to address them? A project manager survey. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26(2), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1109/32.841112

Sauser, B. J., Reilly, R. R., & Shenhar, A. J. (2009). Why projects fail? How contingency theory can provide new insights – A comparative analysis of NASA’s Mars Climate Orbiter loss. International Journal of Project Management, 27(7), 665–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.01.004

Senapathi, M., & Drury-Grogan, M. L. (2017). Refining a model for sustained usage of agile methodologies. Journal of Systems and Software, 132, 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.07.010

Serrador, P., & Pinto, J. (2015). Does Agile work? — A quantitative analysis of agile project success. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1040–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006

Shenhar, A., & Dvir, D. (2009). Reinventando o Gerenciamento de Projetos (Edição: 1). MBOOKS.

Stoneburner, G., Goguen, A. Y., & Feringa, A. (2002). SP 800-30. Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems. National Institute of Standards & Technology.

Svejvig, P., & Andersen, P. (2015). Rethinking project management: A structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.06.004

Tavares, B. G., da Silva, C. E. S., & de Souza, A. D. (2019). Practices to Improve Risk Management in Agile Projects. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 29(03), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218194019500165

Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005

Thomas, M., Jacques, P. H., Adams, J. R., & Kihneman-Wooten, J. (2008). Developing an Effective Project: Planning and Team Building Combined. Project Management Journal, 39(4), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20079

Tomanek, M., & Juricek, J. (2015). Project Risk Management Model Based on PRINCE2 and Scrum Frameworks. International Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 6. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijsea.2015.6107

Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177–195. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284

Zwikael, O., & Globerson, S. (2006). From Critical Success Factors to Critical Success Processes. International Journal of Production Research, 44(17), 3433–3449. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500536921

Downloads

Published

2023-03-01

How to Cite

Martins Alvarez Fernandes, P. J., & Rabechini Jr., R. (2023). Gestão de riscos na abordagem ágil e o sucesso de projetos. Journal of Management & Technology, 23(1), 138–162. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2023.v23i1.2319

Issue

Vol. 23 No. 1 (2023)

Section

ARTIGO

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Management & Technology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: • 1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal. • 2. The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s). • 3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s). • 4. The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA. • 5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. • 6. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. • 7. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html