Designing a dynamic model for evaluating the research and development projects cost focused on technical indicators and market share in knowledge based companies

Authors

  • Sina Laleh Department of Industrial Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  • Nosratollah Shadnoush Industrial Management Department, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  • Abbas Toloie Ashlaghi Industrial Management Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/0.v0i0.1659

Keywords:

Dynamic Model, Economic Valuation of Costs, Research and Development Projects, Knowledge Based Companies

Abstract

In this research, according to the previous studies and the extraction of factors affecting the economic valuation of research costs and the identification of cause and effect circles, a dynamic model has been developed. Subsequently, using the DEMATEL technique, the relationships between them and the effective coefficients were determined and included in the model. Hence, in order to test the accuracy of the model and determine the behavior of the state variables and the rate of information gathering from the eight knowledge based companies in the science and technology parks of Alborz, Pardis and Tehran University in the period of 24 months, by assessing the 24-month behavior of research in the framework of the model as well as sensitivity analysis, the validity of the designed dynamic model was evaluated.

References

Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U., Alp, H., Bloom, N., & Kerr, W. (2018). Innovation, reallocation, and growth. American Economic Review, 108(11), 3450-91.

Ambe, I. M. (2010). Agile supply chain: Strategy for competitive advantage. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 7, 5-17.

Biancardi, M., & Villani, G. (2017). A fuzzy approach for R&D compound option valuation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 310, 108-121.

Engsner, H., Lindholm, M., & Lindskog, F. (2017). R & D expenses insurance assessment: a calculation period The cost of capital approach. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 72, 250-264.

Gierczak, M. (2014). The quantitative risk assessment of MINI, MIDI and MAXI Horizontal Directional Drilling Projects applying Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 43, 67-77.

Jinfa, L., & Biting, L. (2017). Valuation Method of R&D Investment Value of Intelligent Manufacturing Enterprise Based on Growth Option. Procedia Engineering, 174, 301-307.

Jun, S. P., Kim, S. G., & Park, H. W. (2017). The mismatch between demand and beneficiaries of R&D support programs for SMEs: Evidence from Korean R&D planning programs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116, 286-298.

Khoshnevis, P., & Teirlinck, P. (2017). Performance valuation of R&D active firms. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.

Laurel F., Suresh R. (2009), The value relevance of R&D across profit and loss firms. Account. Public Policy 28, pp. 16–32.

Lee, C. K. & Chang T. Y. (2007). “Transnaonal corporaons' R&D localization in a developing nation - A game theory analysis”. Journal of American Academy of Business, 10(2), pp. 225-232.

Lewandowska, A., & Stopa, M. (2017). SMEs Innovativeness and Institutional Support System: The Local Experiences in Qualitative Perspective (No. 60/2017).

Livotov, P. (2018). Competitive Capability Assessment of Industrial Companies within the Framework of Advanced Innovation Design Approach. In DS92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference (pp. 1903-1914).

Martín-Barrera, G., Zamora-Ramírez, C., & González-González, J. M. (2017). Impact of flexibility in public R&D funding: How real options could avoid the crowding-out effect. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 813-823.

Morgan, P., Brown, D. G., Lennard, S., Anderton, M. J., Barrett, J. C., Eriksson, U., ... & Matcham, J. (2018). Impact of a five-dimensional framework on R&D productivity at AstraZeneca. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 17(3), 167.

Resutek Robert J. [2015], R&D intensity, future performance, and operational distress, Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2610847

Rudnik, K., & Małgorzata, A. (2015). System with probabilistic fuzzy knowledge base and parametric inference operators in risk assessment of innovative projects. Expert Systems with Applications. In Press.

Shannon P. Pra, Roger J. Grabowski (2010). “Esmang the cost of equity capital and the overall cost of capital”. Business and Economics, pp. 314-315.

Sharma, P., Davcik, N. S., & Pillai, K. G. (2016). Product innovation as a mediator in the impact of R&D expenditure and brand equity on marketing performance. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5662-5669.

Sharma, S. K., & Chanda, U. (2017). Developing a Bayesian belief network model for prediction of R&D project success. Journal of Management Analytics, 1-24.

Suresi A, (2017). Not-invented-here syndrome and innovation performance: the confounding effect of innovation capabilities as organisational routines in service firms. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21[01], 1750036.

Suzuki, K., & Chida, R. (2017). Contribution of R&D capital to differences in Tobin's q among Japanese manufacturing firms: Evidence from an investment-based asset pricing model. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 43, 38-58.

Wang T, Guo S, Liu Y. (2013). "Pareto process optimization of product development project using bi-objective hybrid genetic algorithm". Advances in Engineering Software 65:12-22

Wang, J. (2017). Structuring innovation funnels for R&D projects under uncertainty. R&D Management, 47[1], 127-140.

Yu, H. (2017). Mechanism Design in Scientific Research Collaboration between Library Consortium and R&D Institutions. Procedia Engineering, 174, 756-759.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-14

How to Cite

Laleh, S., Shadnoush, N., & Toloie Ashlaghi, A. (2019). Designing a dynamic model for evaluating the research and development projects cost focused on technical indicators and market share in knowledge based companies. Journal of Management & Technology, 24–45. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/0.v0i0.1659

Issue

Journal of Management & Technology, Vol. 19. Extraordinary Edition. Jul/Sep. 2019

Section

ARTIGO

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Management & Technology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: • 1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal. • 2. The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s). • 3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s). • 4. The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA. • 5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. • 6. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. • 7. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html