Desenvolvimento e Validação de um Instrumento para Mensurar a Preocupação de Usuários de Smartphones sobre a Invasão de Privacidade

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2018.v18i3.1462

Keywords:

Invasão de privacidade, Smartphones, Validação de instrumento de pesquisa.

Abstract

O uso de smartphones cresceu de forma consistente ao longo dos últimos anos. Na medida que os aparelhos adquiriram novas funções, aumentou a sua capacidade de suportar serviços e aplicações. Preocupações sobre a privacidade durante o uso dos equipamentos como: coleta e armazenamento de dados, localização e uso de informações por terceiros sem autorização passaram a ser comuns entre os usuários. O presente artigo apresenta um questionário composto por cinco dimensões e dezesseis itens e tem como objetivo iniciar o processo de desenvolvimento e validação de uma escala para mensurar os fatores que influenciam a preocupação dos usuários sobre invasão de privacidade durante o uso de smartphones. Dentre as conclusões, verificou-se que a inclusão de duas dimensões que mensuram percepções positivas relacionadas ao uso dos aparelhos (Auto Eficácia e Benefício Percebido), pode contribuir para a mensuração de como os usuários avaliam as ameaças e benefícios ao usar os smartphones.

Author Biographies

Yves Wanderley Estanislau da Costa Netto, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Graduado em Administração pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (2014). Mestre em Administração Estratégica na área de Gestão da Informação pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (2017) Doutorando em Administração na área de Gestão de Sistemas e Tecnologia da Informação na Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (2017)

Vergílio Ricardo Ricardo Britto da Silva, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul

Mestre em Administração com concentração em estudos sobre Segurança da Informação, com foco em Privacidade na Internet, Bacharel em Administração com Linha de formação em Gestão da Tecnologia da Informação, ambos pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul PUCRS. Atua no momento como Analista de Processos Pleno na Coordenadoria de Planejamento e Gestão da Pró-Reitoria de Extensão e Assuntos Comunitários da PUCRS.Atuou como Analista de Processos Plena na Coordenadoria de Processos Organizacionais, Coordenador Administrativo no Centro de Educação Continuada, Coordenador do Laboratório de Informática da Faculdade de Administração, Contabilidade e Economia e Membro do Comitê Gestor do Projeto Sinergia Digital.

Antônio Carlos Gastaud Maçada, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Doutorado em Administração (2001) – Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS);
Visiting Scholar, UTEP, Texas, El Paso, USA (1999/2000); Professor, Texas A&M, College Station, USA (2011/2012); Mestrado em Administração (1993) – Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS); Especialização em Economia (1989) – Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL);
Graduação Administração (1985) – Fundação Universidade de Rio Grande (FURG)

References

Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V., & Day, G. S. (2008). Marketing research: John Wiley & Sons.

Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science, 347(6221), 509-514.

Acquisti, A., & Grossklags, J. (2005). Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Security & Privacy, 3(1), 26-33.

Akhter, S. (2014). Privacy concern and online transactions: the impact of internet self-efficacy and internet involvement. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 31(2), 118-125.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.

Botha, R. A., Furnell, S. M., & Clarke, N. L. (2009). From desktop to mobile: Examining the security experience. Computers & Security, 28(3-4), 130-137.

Carvalho, C. A., & Vieira, M. M. F. (2007). O poder nas organizações: Thomson.

Chellappa, R. K., & Sin, R. G. (2005). Personalization versus privacy: An empirical examination of the online consumer’s dilemma. Information technology and management, 6(2-3), 181-202.

Chin, E., Felt, A. P., Sekar, V., & Wagner, D. (2012). Measuring user confidence in smartphone security and privacy. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security.

Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. Mis Quarterly, 189-211.

Computerworld. (2017, 09 Abr. 2017). Mais privacidade e segurança nas comunicações móveis envolve decisões políticas, diz estudo. Retrieved 20 Jul. 2018, 2018, from http://computerworld.com.br/2017/4/9/mais-privacidade-e-seguranca-nas-comunicacoes-moveis-envolve-decisoes-politicas-diz-estudo

Culnan, M. J. (1993). " How Did They Get My Name?": An Exploratory Investigation of Consumer Attitudes toward Secondary Information Use. Mis Quarterly, 341-363.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Mis Quarterly, 319-340.

Degirmenci, K., Guhr, N., & Breitner, M. H. (2013). Mobile applications and access to personal information: A discussion of users' privacy concerns.

Dehling, T., & Sunyaev, A. (2014). Information Security and Privacy of Patient-Centered Health IT Services: What Needs to Be Done? Paper presented at the System Sciences (HICSS), 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on.

Dienlin, T., & Trepte, S. (2015). Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in‐depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 285-297.

Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). Privacy concerns and levels of information exchange: An empirical investigation of intended e-services use. E-Service, 4(3), 25-60.

Dogruel, L., Joeckel, S., & Vitak, J. (2017). The valuation of privacy premium features for smartphone apps: The influence of defaults and expert recommendations. Computers in Human Behavior.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of marketing research, 382-388.

Forsythe, S., Liu, C., Shannon, D., & Gardner, L. C. (2006). Development of a scale to measure the perceived benefits and risks of online shopping. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 20(2), 55-75.

Gecas, V. (1989). The social psychology of self-efficacy. Annual review of sociology, 15(1), 291-316.

Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of marketing research, 186-192.

Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of management review, 12(3), 472-485.

Hair, J., Babin, B., Money, A., & Samouel, P. (2005). Fundamentos de métodos de pesquisa em administração: Bookman Companhia Ed.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 5): Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Hair Jr, J. F., Gabriel, M. L. D. d. S., & Patel, V. K. (2014). Modelagem de Equações Estruturais Baseada em Covariância (CB-SEM) com o AMOS: Orientações sobre a sua aplicação como uma Ferramenta de Pesquisa de Marketing. REMark, 13(2), 43.

Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational research methods, 1(1), 104-121.

Introna, L., & Pouloudi, A. (1999). Privacy in the information age: Stakeholders, interests and values. Journal of Business Ethics, 22(1), 27-38.

Junglas, I. A., Johnson, N. A., & Spitzmüller, C. (2008). Personality traits and concern for privacy: an empirical study in the context of location-based services. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(4), 387-402.

Ketelaar, P. E., & van Balen, M. (2018). The smartphone as your follower: The role of smartphone literacy in the relation between privacy concerns, attitude and behaviour towards phone-embedded tracking. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 174-182.

Kinard, B. R., & Capella, M. L. (2006). Relationship marketing: the influence of consumer involvement on perceived service benefits. Journal of Services Marketing, 20(6), 359-368.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (3rd ed.): Guilford Press.

Kokolakis, S. (2017). Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Computers & Security, 64, 122-134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002

Koufteros, X. A. (1999). Testing a model of pull production: a paradigm for manufacturing research using structural equation modeling. Journal of Operations Management, 17(4), 467-488.

La Polla, M., Martinelli, F., & Sgandurra, D. (2013). A survey on security for mobile devices. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 15(1), 446-471.

Lewis, B. R., & Byrd, T. A. (2003). Development of a measure for the information technology infrastructure construct. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(2), 93-109.

Lom, H. S., Thoo, A. C., Sulaiman, Z., & Adam, S. (2018). Moderating Role of Mobile Users' Information Privacy Concerns Towards Behavioural Intention and Use Behaviour in Mobile Advertising. Advanced Science Letters, 24(6), 4259-4264. doi: 10.1166/asl.2018.11584

Luarn, P., & Lin, H.-H. (2005). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 873-891.

Lynch, M. (2016, 19 Feb. 2016, ). Leave My IPhone Alone: Why Our Smartphones Are Extensions of Ourselves., from www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/feb/19/iphone-apple-privacy-smartphones-extension-of-ourselves.

Malhotra, N. K. (2012). Pesquisa de marketing: uma orientação aplicada: Bookman Editora.

Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information systems research, 15(4), 336-355.

Newell, P. B. (1995). Perspectives on privacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(2), 87-104.

Norusis, M. J. (1993). SPSS: SPSS for Windows, base system user's guide release 6.0: SPSS Inc.

Nov, O., & Wattal, S. (2009). Social computing privacy concerns: antecedents and effects. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems.

Oppenheim, A. N. (2000). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Research commentary: Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information systems research, 12(2), 121-134.

Pedersen, D. M. (1997). Psychological functions of privacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(2), 147-156.

Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated analysis: Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (2013). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach: Psychology Press.

Pennekamp, J., Henze, M., & Wehrle, K. (2017). A survey on the evolution of privacy enforcement on smartphones and the road ahead. Pervasive and Mobile Computing.

Pinsonneault, A., & Kraemer, K. (1993). Survey research methodology in management information systems: an assessment. Journal of management information systems, 10(2), 75-105.

Preibusch, S. (2013). Guide to measuring privacy concern: Review of survey and observational instruments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(12), 1133-1143.

Ryschka, S., Rodewyk, B., Ha, K.-H., & Bick, M. (2014). A qualitative investigation of risk perceptions in the case of check-in services.

Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., & Burke, S. J. (1996). Information privacy: measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices. Mis Quarterly, 167-196.

Solove, D. J. (2007). I've got nothing to hide and other misunderstandings of privacy. San Diego L. Rev., 44, 745.

Stewart, K. A., & Segars, A. H. (2002). An empirical examination of the concern for information privacy instrument. Information systems research, 13(1), 36-49.

Sutanto, J., Palme, E., Tan, C.-H., & Phang, C. W. (2013). Addressing the Personalization-Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Assessment from a Field Experiment on Smartphone Users. Mis Quarterly, 37(4).

Tan, C. (2014). Empirical Study on Acceptance Level of Mobile Transaction Due To Privacy Invasion: eprints.intimal.edu.my.

Wang, C., Wang, C., Chen, Y., Xie, L., & Lu, S. (2017). Smartphone Privacy Leakage of Social Relationships and Demographics from Surrounding Access Points. Paper presented at the Proceedings - International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems.

Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., & Jöreskog, K. G. (1974). Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological measurement, 34(1), 25-33.

Westin, A. F. (2003). Social and political dimensions of privacy. Journal of social issues, 59(2), 431-453.

Wilson, D., & Valacich, J. S. (2012). Unpacking the privacy paradox: Irrational decision-making within the privacy calculus.

Xu, H. (2007). The effects of self-construal and perceived control on privacy concerns. ICIS 2007 proceedings, 125.

Xu, H., Gupta, S., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2012). Measuring mobile users' concerns for information privacy.

Xu, H., & Tan, B. C. Y. (2012). Why Do I Keep Checking Facebook: Effects of Message Characteristics On the Formation of Social Network Services Addiction. ICIS 2012 Proceedings.

Xu, K., Li, J., Lau, R., Liao, S., & Fang, B. (2011). An Effective Method of Discovering Target Groups on Social Networking Sites. ICIS 2011 Proceedings.

Xu, Y., Zhang, C., Xue, L., & Yeo, L. L. (2008). Product Adoption in Online Social Network. ICIS 2008 Proceedings.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 82-91. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1016

Downloads

Published

2018-08-21

How to Cite

Costa Netto, Y. W. E. da, Britto da Silva, V. R. R., & Maçada, A. C. G. (2018). Desenvolvimento e Validação de um Instrumento para Mensurar a Preocupação de Usuários de Smartphones sobre a Invasão de Privacidade. Journal of Management & Technology, 18(3), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2018.v18i3.1462

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 3 (2018): Ed. extraordinária

Section

ARTIGO

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Management & Technology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: • 1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal. • 2. The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s). • 3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s). • 4. The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA. • 5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. • 6. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. • 7. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html