Abordagens teóricas em dados governamentais abertos

Authors

  • Lucas Geraldo Campos Dalenogare Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
  • Maria Arlete Duarte de Araújo Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2019.v19i5.1382

Keywords:

Dados governamentais abertos, Dados públicos, Política de dados abertos.

Abstract

Este artigo tem por objetivo identificar as abordagens teóricas adotadas internacionalmente, nos últimos cinco anos, em estudos sobre Dados Governamentais Abertos. Para tanto, optou-se pela realização de uma Revisão Sistemática de Literatura, guiada pelo protocolo Kitchenham (2007). As análises abrangeram vinte e sete estudos realizados em dezenove países. Dos estudos analisados emerge a discussão de elementos teóricos acerca dos próprios dados abertos – como conceitos, requisitos, barreiras e benefícios – e de teorias associadas – como Teoria Institucional, Teoria Cognitiva, Teoria do Estado Informacional, Teoria de Ecossistemas, Teorias de Informação Interagência, da Perspectiva Multi-Nível e de Cross-boundaryou Interorganizacional, sinalizando para a ausência de uma escola de pensamento que aglutine os estudiosos do tema. Outrossim, revela-se também o potencial das políticas de dados abertos para um maior fortalecimento da democracia, geração de valor econômico, inovações e avanços técnico-gerenciais nas organizações públicas.

Author Biographies

Lucas Geraldo Campos Dalenogare, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Mestrando em Administração no Departamento de Ciências Administrativas da UFRN. Especialista em Gestão Pública. Graduado em Administração.

Maria Arlete Duarte de Araújo, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Doutora em Administração. Professora titular da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Departamento de Ciências Administrativas.

References

Afful-Dadzie, E., & Afful-Dadzie, A. (2017). Open Government Data in Africa: a preference elicitation analysis of media practitioners. Government Information Quarterly. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.005.

Albano, C. S. (2014). Dados Governamentais Abertos: proposta de um modelo de produção e utilização de informações sob a ótica conceitual da cadeia de valor (Tese de Doutorado). Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Attard, J., Orlandi F., Scerri, S., & Auer, S. (2015). A systematic review of open government data initiatives, Government Information Quarterly, 2015. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.006.

Bates, J. (2014). The strategic importance of information policy for the contemporary neoliberal state: the case of Open Government Data in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.02.009.

Chatfield, A. T., & Reddick, C. G. (2017a). A longitudinal cross-sector analysis of open data portal service capability: the case of Australian local governments. Government Information Quarterly. Disponível em: < http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.004>.

Chatfield, A. T., & Reddick, C. G. (2017b). The role of policy entrepreneurs in open government data policy innovation diffusion: an analysis of Australian Federal and State Governments. Government Information Quarterly. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.004.

Conradie, P., & Choenni, S. (2014). On the barriers for local government releasing open data. Government Information Quarterly. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.003.

Corrêa, A. S., Paula, E. C., Corrêa, P. L. P., & Silva, F. S. C. (2017). Transparency and open government data: a wide national assessment of data openness in Brazilian local governments. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. 11, Issue: 1, pp.58-78. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12-2015-0052.

Dawes, S. S., Vidiasova, L., & Parkhimovich, O. (2016). Planning and designing open government data programs: an ecosystem approach. Government Information Quarterly. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.003.

Fan, B., & Zhao, Y. (2017). The moderating effect of external pressure on the relationship between internal organizational factors and the quality of open government data. Government Information Quarterly. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.006.

Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. V 2.3. EBSE Technical Report. Keele University: United Kingdom.

Mckinley, W., Mone, M. A., & Moon, G. (2003). Determinantes e Desenvolvimento de Escolas na Teoria Organizacional. RAE, jul/set.

Magalhaes, G., & Roseira, C. (2017). Open government data and the private sector: an empirical view on business models and value creation. Government Information Quarterly. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.004.

Martin, C. (2014) Barriers to the Open Government Data agenda: taking a multi-level perspective. Policy & Internet, Vol. 6, No. 3.

Mendonça, P. G. A., Maciel, C., & Viterbo, J. (2015) Visualizing Aedes aegypti infestation in urban areas: a case study on open government data mashups. Information Polity, V 20, 119–134. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/IP-150361.

Sampieri, R. H., Collado, C. F., & Lucio, M. Del P. B. (2013). Metodologia da pesquisa. 5. ed. Porto Alegre: Penso.

Susha, I., Grönlund, Å., & Janssen, M. (2015). Driving factors of service innovation using open government data: an exploratory study of entrepreneurs in two countries. Information Polity, V 20, 19–34. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ip-150353.

Veljković, N., Bogdanović-Dinić, S., & Stoimenov, L. (2014). Benchmarking open government: an open data perspective. Government Information Quarterly. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.011.

Viscusi, G., Spahiu, B., Maurino, A., & Batini, C. (2014). Compliance with open government data policies: an empirical assessment of Italian local public administrations. Information Polity, V 19, 263–275. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ip-140338.

Wang, H.-J., & Lo, J. (2015). Adoption of open government data among government agencies. Government Information Quarterly. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.004.

Whitmore, A. (2014). Using open government data to predict war: a case study of data and systems challenges. Government Information Quarterly. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.04.003.

Wirtz, B. W., Piehler, R., Thomas, M.-J., & Daiser, P. (2015). Resistance of public personnel to open government: a cognitive theory view of implementation barriers towards open government data. Public Management Review. Disponível em: < http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1103889>.

World Wide Web Foundation. (2016). Open Data Barometer. Disponível em: < http://opendatabarometer.org/?_year=2016&indicator=ODB>. Acesso em: 16 fev. 2018.

Yang, T.-M., & Wu, Y.-J. (2016). Examining the socio-technical determinants influencing government agencies' open data publication: a study in Taiwan. Government Information Quarterly. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.05.003.

Zhu, X. (2017). The failure of an early episode in the open government data movement: a historical case study. Government Information Quarterly. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.004.

Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Kaa, G. V., & Poulis, K. (2016). The wicked problem of commercial value creation in open data ecosystems: policy guidelines for governments. Information Polity, V 21, 223–236. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3233/IP-160391.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-19

How to Cite

Dalenogare, L. G. C., & Araújo, M. A. D. de. (2019). Abordagens teóricas em dados governamentais abertos. Journal of Management & Technology, 19(5), 296–314. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2019.v19i5.1382

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 5 (2019): Outubro/Dezembro

Section

ENSAIO

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Management & Technology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: • 1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal. • 2. The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s). • 3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s). • 4. The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA. • 5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. • 6. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. • 7. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html