Estrutura e dinâmica em redes interorganizacionais: estudo de caso da rede de inovação da Fiocruz Paraná

Authors

  • Leandro Rodrigo Canto Bonfim Universidade Federal do Paraná, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0323-7911
  • Sandro Aparecido Gonçalves Instituto Brasileiro de Pesquisas e Estudos Sociais (IBEPES)
  • Andréa Paula Segatto Universidade Federal do Paraná, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2018.v18i3.1173

Keywords:

Redes interorganizacionais, Dinâmica de redes, Inovação, Biotecnologia, Análise de redes sociais

Abstract

A dinâmicas das redes interorganizacionais têm se tornado tema de interesse nos estudos da área de negócios. Assim, a presente investigação buscou analisar como se deu a formação e a evolução de uma rede de inovação em biologia molecular biologia molecular voltada para os diagnósticos em Saúde Pública no sul do Brasil por meio de uma organização focal. O método adotado foi a análise de redes sociais (ARS) com recorte temporal transversal com aproximação longitudinal, a partir de evidências documentais fornecidas pela organização e de dados secundários. Os resultados demonstraram que a dinâmica da rede favoreceu a sua abertura, com o surgimento de buracos estruturais, porém, com adensamento das relações de proximidade e confiança com os laços vizinhos. Ademais, percebeu-se maior abertura da rede quanto aos laços com organizações de origem e finalidades distintas. Este estudo contribuiu ao ampliar a compreensão acerca da formação e evolução de redes de inovação.

References

Abosag, I., Yen, D. A., & Barnes, B. R. (2016). What is dark about the dark-side of business relationships? Industrial Marketing Management, 55, 5-9.

Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.

Ahuja, G., Soda, G., & Zaheer, A. (2012). The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organization Science, 23(2), 434-448.

Amburgey, T. L., Al-Laham, A., Tzabbar, D., & Aharonson, B. (2008). The structural evolution of multiplex organizational networks: research and commerce in biotechnology. In J. A. C. Baum & T. J. Rowley (Eds.), Network Strategy: advances in strategic management (Vol. 25, pp. 171-209). Bingley, UK: Emerald.

Bonfim, L. R. C., Gonçalves, S. A., Moreira, M. S., & Jacometti, M. (2016). Institutional Entrepreneurship and Improvement of Quality of Life: the formation and legitimation of a public-private innovation network in molecular biology applied to public health in Southern Brazil. In J. C. C. Leitão & H. M. B. Alves (Eds.), Innovative and entrepreneurial practices in public institutions: a quality-of-life approach (pp. 123-154). Cham: Springer.

Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis.

Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Shirey, P. R. (1990). LS sets, lambda sets and other cohesive subsets. Social networks, 12(4), 337-357.

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: the social structure of competition. In R. G. Eccles & N. Nohria (Eds.), Network and organizations: structure, form and action (pp. 57-93). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Burt, R. S. (2000). Decay functions. Social networks, 22(1), 1-28.

Burt, R. S. (2001). Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In N. Lin, K. S. Cook, & R. S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: theory and research (pp. 31-56). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

Castilla, E. J., Hwang, H., Granovetter, E., & Granovetter, M. S. (2000). Social networks in silicon valley. In C. M. Lee, W. F. Miller, M. G. Hancock, & H. S. Rowen (Eds.), The Silicon Valley edge: A habitat for innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 218-247). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95-S120.

Crespo, J., Suire, R., & Vicente, J. (2016). Network structural properties for cluster long-run dynamics: evidence from collaborative R&D networks in the European mobile phone industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(2), 261-282.

Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1411-1454.

Funk, R. J., & Owen-Smith, J. (2017). A dynamic network measure of technological change. Management Science, 63(3), 791–817.

Gausdal, A. H., Svare, H., & Möllering, G. (2016). Why don’t all high-trust networks achieve strong network benefits? A case-based exploration of cooperation in Norwegian SME networks. Journal of Trust Research, 6(2), 194-212.

Gilsing, V., & Nooteboom, B. (2005). Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: an analysis of multimedia and biotechnology. European Management Review, 2(3), 179-197.

Grandori, A. (1997). An organizational assessment of interfirm coordination modes. Organization Studies, 18(6), 897-925. doi:10.1177/017084069701800601

Grandori, A., & Soda, G. (1995). Inter-firm networks: antecedents, mechanisms and forms. Organization Studies, 16(2), 183-214.

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.

Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.

Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203.

Hage, J., Mote, J. E., & Jordan, G. B. (2013). Ideas, innovations, and networks: a new policy model based on the evolution of knowledge. Policy Sciences, 46(2), 199-216.

Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California Riverside.

Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: the importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (pp. 216-239). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. N. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), 123-140.

Krieger, M. A., Souza, R., Alvarez, P., Ferreira, A., & Moreira, M. S. (2013). Cooperação técnico–científica entre instituições públicas e privadas para incorporação tecnológica: impacto da nacionalização do teste NAT HIV e HCV na ampliação do acesso e na formação de base tecnológica no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde. Divulgação para Saúde em Debate, 50, 102-112.

Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 638-658.

Lee, S., & Monge, P. (2011). The coevolution of multiplex communication networks in organizational communities. Journal of Communication, 61(4), 758-779.

Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2004). Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community. Organization Science, 15(1), 5-21.

Phelps, C. C. (2010). A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 890-913.

Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295-336.

Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-145.

Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W., & Owen‐Smith, J. (2005). Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1132-1205. doi:10.1086/421508

Rossoni, L. (2006). A dinâmica das relações no campo da pesquisa em organizações e estratégia no Brasil: uma análise institucional. (Mestrado em Administração), Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR.

Rowley, T., Behrens, D., & Krackhardt, D. (2000). Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 369-386.

Soda, G., Usai, A., & Zaheer, A. (2004). Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 893-906.

Thorelli, H. B. (1986). Networks: between markets and hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), 37-51.

Vasudeva, G., Zaheer, A., & Hernandez, E. (2013). The Embeddedness of Networks: Institutions, Structural Holes, and Innovativeness in the Fuel Cell Industry. Organization Science, 24(3), 645-663.

Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269-296.

Wood Jr., T. (2010). Organizações híbridas. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 50(2), 241-247.

Published

2018-11-25

How to Cite

Bonfim, L. R. C., Gonçalves, S. A., & Segatto, A. P. (2018). Estrutura e dinâmica em redes interorganizacionais: estudo de caso da rede de inovação da Fiocruz Paraná. Journal of Management & Technology, 18(3), 90–111. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2018.v18i3.1173