Estrutura e dinâmica em redes interorganizacionais: estudo de caso da rede de inovação da Fiocruz Paraná

Authors

  • Leandro Rodrigo Canto Bonfim Universidade Federal do Paraná, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0323-7911
  • Sandro Aparecido Gonçalves Instituto Brasileiro de Pesquisas e Estudos Sociais (IBEPES)
  • Andréa Paula Segatto Universidade Federal do Paraná, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2018.v18i3.1173

Keywords:

Redes interorganizacionais, Dinâmica de redes, Inovação, Biotecnologia, Análise de redes sociais

Abstract

A dinâmicas das redes interorganizacionais têm se tornado tema de interesse nos estudos da área de negócios. Assim, a presente investigação buscou analisar como se deu a formação e a evolução de uma rede de inovação em biologia molecular biologia molecular voltada para os diagnósticos em Saúde Pública no sul do Brasil por meio de uma organização focal. O método adotado foi a análise de redes sociais (ARS) com recorte temporal transversal com aproximação longitudinal, a partir de evidências documentais fornecidas pela organização e de dados secundários. Os resultados demonstraram que a dinâmica da rede favoreceu a sua abertura, com o surgimento de buracos estruturais, porém, com adensamento das relações de proximidade e confiança com os laços vizinhos. Ademais, percebeu-se maior abertura da rede quanto aos laços com organizações de origem e finalidades distintas. Este estudo contribuiu ao ampliar a compreensão acerca da formação e evolução de redes de inovação.

References

Abosag, I., Yen, D. A., & Barnes, B. R. (2016). What is dark about the dark-side of business relationships? Industrial Marketing Management, 55, 5-9.

Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.

Ahuja, G., Soda, G., & Zaheer, A. (2012). The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organization Science, 23(2), 434-448.

Amburgey, T. L., Al-Laham, A., Tzabbar, D., & Aharonson, B. (2008). The structural evolution of multiplex organizational networks: research and commerce in biotechnology. In J. A. C. Baum & T. J. Rowley (Eds.), Network Strategy: advances in strategic management (Vol. 25, pp. 171-209). Bingley, UK: Emerald.

Bonfim, L. R. C., Gonçalves, S. A., Moreira, M. S., & Jacometti, M. (2016). Institutional Entrepreneurship and Improvement of Quality of Life: the formation and legitimation of a public-private innovation network in molecular biology applied to public health in Southern Brazil. In J. C. C. Leitão & H. M. B. Alves (Eds.), Innovative and entrepreneurial practices in public institutions: a quality-of-life approach (pp. 123-154). Cham: Springer.

Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis.

Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Shirey, P. R. (1990). LS sets, lambda sets and other cohesive subsets. Social networks, 12(4), 337-357.

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: the social structure of competition. In R. G. Eccles & N. Nohria (Eds.), Network and organizations: structure, form and action (pp. 57-93). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Burt, R. S. (2000). Decay functions. Social networks, 22(1), 1-28.

Burt, R. S. (2001). Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In N. Lin, K. S. Cook, & R. S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: theory and research (pp. 31-56). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

Castilla, E. J., Hwang, H., Granovetter, E., & Granovetter, M. S. (2000). Social networks in silicon valley. In C. M. Lee, W. F. Miller, M. G. Hancock, & H. S. Rowen (Eds.), The Silicon Valley edge: A habitat for innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 218-247). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95-S120.

Crespo, J., Suire, R., & Vicente, J. (2016). Network structural properties for cluster long-run dynamics: evidence from collaborative R&D networks in the European mobile phone industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(2), 261-282.

Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1411-1454.

Funk, R. J., & Owen-Smith, J. (2017). A dynamic network measure of technological change. Management Science, 63(3), 791–817.

Gausdal, A. H., Svare, H., & Möllering, G. (2016). Why don’t all high-trust networks achieve strong network benefits? A case-based exploration of cooperation in Norwegian SME networks. Journal of Trust Research, 6(2), 194-212.

Gilsing, V., & Nooteboom, B. (2005). Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: an analysis of multimedia and biotechnology. European Management Review, 2(3), 179-197.

Grandori, A. (1997). An organizational assessment of interfirm coordination modes. Organization Studies, 18(6), 897-925. doi:10.1177/017084069701800601

Grandori, A., & Soda, G. (1995). Inter-firm networks: antecedents, mechanisms and forms. Organization Studies, 16(2), 183-214.

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.

Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.

Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203.

Hage, J., Mote, J. E., & Jordan, G. B. (2013). Ideas, innovations, and networks: a new policy model based on the evolution of knowledge. Policy Sciences, 46(2), 199-216.

Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California Riverside.

Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: the importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (pp. 216-239). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. N. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), 123-140.

Krieger, M. A., Souza, R., Alvarez, P., Ferreira, A., & Moreira, M. S. (2013). Cooperação técnico–científica entre instituições públicas e privadas para incorporação tecnológica: impacto da nacionalização do teste NAT HIV e HCV na ampliação do acesso e na formação de base tecnológica no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde. Divulgação para Saúde em Debate, 50, 102-112.

Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 638-658.

Lee, S., & Monge, P. (2011). The coevolution of multiplex communication networks in organizational communities. Journal of Communication, 61(4), 758-779.

Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2004). Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community. Organization Science, 15(1), 5-21.

Phelps, C. C. (2010). A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 890-913.

Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295-336.

Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-145.

Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W., & Owen‐Smith, J. (2005). Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1132-1205. doi:10.1086/421508

Rossoni, L. (2006). A dinâmica das relações no campo da pesquisa em organizações e estratégia no Brasil: uma análise institucional. (Mestrado em Administração), Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR.

Rowley, T., Behrens, D., & Krackhardt, D. (2000). Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 369-386.

Soda, G., Usai, A., & Zaheer, A. (2004). Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 893-906.

Thorelli, H. B. (1986). Networks: between markets and hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), 37-51.

Vasudeva, G., Zaheer, A., & Hernandez, E. (2013). The Embeddedness of Networks: Institutions, Structural Holes, and Innovativeness in the Fuel Cell Industry. Organization Science, 24(3), 645-663.

Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269-296.

Wood Jr., T. (2010). Organizações híbridas. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 50(2), 241-247.

Downloads

Published

2018-11-25

How to Cite

Bonfim, L. R. C., Gonçalves, S. A., & Segatto, A. P. (2018). Estrutura e dinâmica em redes interorganizacionais: estudo de caso da rede de inovação da Fiocruz Paraná. Journal of Management & Technology, 18(3), 90–111. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2018.v18i3.1173

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 3 (2018): Setembro/ Dezembro

Section

ARTIGO

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Management & Technology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: • 1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal. • 2. The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s). • 3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s). • 4. The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA. • 5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. • 6. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. • 7. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html