O efeito da relação entre a motivação e o engajamento no desempenho do indivíduo da equipe de projetos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2025.v25i1.2758Palavras-chave:
Motivação, Engajamento, Desempenho do Indivíduo, Work From Home, Gerenciamento de ProjetosResumo
O objetivo destes estudo é Analisar como a motivação afeta o engajamento no desempenho dos indivíduos em equipes de projetos em diferentes regimes de trabalho. A abordagem deste estudo é quantitativa, utilizando uma survey para a coleta de dados. O procedimento metodológico adotado para testar as hipóteses diretas foi a modelagem de equações estruturais.O regime de trabalho ou híbrido levou a mudanças significativas nas organizações em relação ao comportamento e práticas dos indivíduos nas equipes de projetos. Nesse contexto, a motivação e o engajamento são fatores que podem impulsionar o desempenho do indivíduo na equipe de projetos. Como resultados, pode-se apontar que O modelo conceitual proposto foi validado. Ao analisar os regimes de trabalho isoladamente, o modelo apresenta uma capacidade explicativa do desempenho do indivíduo da equipe de projetos em regime presencial e híbrido, e baixa para o work from home.Os resultados obtidos a permitirão avançar as discussões sobre os constructos: motivação, engajamento, desempenho do indivíduo e dos regimes de trabalho, em especial o regime de trabalho work from home. Para a prática, este trabalho fornece percepções e entendimentos para os gestores de projetos lidarem com desafios de gestão de equipes, além de oferecer informações valiosas para as organizações e gestores de projetos que estão buscando otimizar o desempenho das suas equipes em um ambiente de trabalho remoto ou híbrido.
Referências
Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., & Gurău, C. (2011). Virtual team performance in a highly competitive environment. Group & Organization Management, 36(2), 161-190.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110391251
Alon, I., Boulanger, M., Meyers, J., & Taras, V. (2016). The development and validation of the business cultural intelligence quotient. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 23(1), 78-100.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-10-2015-0138
Angst, R., Benevides-Pereira, A., & Porto-Martins, P. (2009). UWES manual–português BR. GEPEB-Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre Estresse e Burnout.
Bailey, C., Madden, A., Alfes, K., & Fletcher, L. (2017). The meaning, antecedents and outcomes of employee engagement: A narrative synthesis. International journal of management reviews, 19(1), 31-53.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12077
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2014). Job demands–resources theory. Wellbeing: A complete reference guide, 1-28.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118539415.wbwell019
Balog, A., & Pribeanu, C. (2010). The role of perceived enjoyment in the students’ acceptance of an augmented reality teaching platform: A structural equation modelling approach. Studies in Informatics and Control, 19(3), 319-330.
https://doi.org/10.24846/v19i3y201011
Bick, A., Blandin, A., & Mertens, K. (2020). Work from home after the COVID-19 outbreak.
https://doi.org/10.24149/wp2017
Bizarrias, F. S., da Silva, L. F., & Penha, R. (2023). Preparação de dados e boas práticas em pesquisas quantitativas. Gestão e Projetos: GeP, 14(1), 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v14i1.22024
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human performance, 10(2), 99-109.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 687–732. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Campbell, J. P., Gasser, M. B., & Oswald, F. L. (1996). The substantive nature of job performance variability. Individual differences and behavior in organizations, 258, 299.
Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. Personnel selection in organizations, 3570, 35-70.
Chang, R. X., Carvalho, M. M., & Sbragia, R. (2022). Towards a comprehensive conceptual framework for multicultural virtual teams: a multilevel perspective exploring the relationship between multiculturalism and performance. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, (ahead-of-print).
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-09-2021-0252
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Cook, D. J., Mulrow, C. D., & Haynes, R. B. (1997). Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of internal medicine, 126(5), 376-380.
https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-126-5-199703010-00006
De Castella, K., Byrne, D., & Covington, M. (2013). Unmotivated or motivated to fail? A cross-cultural study of achievement motivation, fear of failure, and student disengagement. Journal of educational psychology, 105(3), 861.
https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0032464
Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science review. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19-43.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer US.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Dos Santos, N. R., Mónico, L., Pais, L., Gagné, M., Forest, J., Cabral, P. M. F., & Ferraro, T. (2022). The multidimensional work motivation scale: psychometric studies in Portugal and Brazil. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management.
https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-07-2021-1206
Fadzilah, N., Hanafi, M., Fatimah, S., Rahmat, N., Kadar, A., Athirah, A., ... & Rozman Azram, A. A. (2021). A study of work from home motivation among employees. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 11(8), 388-398.
DOI: 10.18488/journal.1.2021.118.388.398
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., Van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. K., ... & Westbye, C. (2015). The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178-196.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892
Garrison, G., Wakefield, R. L., Xu, X., & Kim, S. H. (2010). Globally distributed teams: The effect of diversity on trust, cohesion and individual performance. ACM SIGMIS Database: the database for Advances in Information Systems, 41(3), 27-48.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1851175.1851178
Gerhardt, T. E., & Silveira, D. T. (2009). Métodos de pesquisa. Plageder.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados. Bookman Editora.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European business review.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3e). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 87(2), 268.
https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268
Henderson, L. S., Stackman, R. W., & Lindekilde, R. (2016). The centrality of communication norm alignment, role clarity, and trust in global project teams. International journal of project management, 34(8), 1717-1730.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.09.012
Henderson, L. S., Stackman, R. W., & Lindekilde, R. (2018). Why cultural intelligence matters on global project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 36(7), 954-967.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.06.001
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees: Harvard Business Review Boston. 46(1) 53-62.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of management journal, 33(4), 692-724.
https://doi.org/10.5465/256287
Karatepe, O. M., Yavas, U., Babakus, E., & Deitz, G. D. (2018). The effects of organizational and personal resources on stress, engagement, and job outcomes. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 74, 147-161.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.04.005
Lee-Kelley, L., & Sankey, T. (2008). Global virtual teams for value creation and project success: A case study. International journal of project management, 26(1), 51-62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.010
LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with Big Five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 326–336.
Levin, J., Fox, J. A., & Forde, D. R. (2012). Estatísticas para ciências humanas (11a). Pearson Education do Brasil.
Lim, V. K., & Teo, T. S. (2000). To work or not to work at home‐An empirical investigation of factors affecting attitudes towards teleworking. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(6), 560-586.
https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940010373392
Liu, Y., Zhu, N., Zhang, J., & Raza, J. (2021). Does organizational reciprocity improve employees’ motivation? The mediating role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Current Psychology, 40(7), 3136-3150.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00984-x
Mas, A., Mesquida, A. L., & Colomo-Palacio, R. (2020). Enhancing the student perception on software project management in computer science. IEEE Transactions on Education, 64(1), 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2020.2998429
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of organizational behavior, 2(2), 99-113.
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). The Truth about Burnout: How Organizations Cause Personal Stress and What to do about It. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
Moraes, R. D. O. (2004). Condicionantes de desempenho dos projetos de software e a influência da maturidade em gestão de projetos (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo).
Muethel, M., Gehrlein, S., & Hoegl, M. (2012). Socio‐demographic factors and shared leadership behaviors in dispersed teams: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management, 51(4), 525-548.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21488
OECD (2020), Digital Transformation in the Age of COVID-19: Building Resilience and Bridging Divides, Digital Economy Outlook 2020 Supplement, OECD, Paris, www.oecd.org/digital/digital-economy-outlook-covid.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1787/bb167041-en
Ozkan, N., Erdil, O., & Gök, M. Ş. (2022, January). Agile teams working from home during the covid-19 pandemic: A literature review on new advantages and challenges. In International Conference on Lean and Agile Software Development (pp. 38-60). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94238-0_3
Pasquali, L. (2004). Psicometria: teoria dos testes na psicologia e na educação. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.
Pinder, C.C. (1998). Work motivation in organizational behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Ringle, C. M., Da Silva, D., & de Souza Bido, D. (2014). Modelagem de equações estruturais com utilização do SmartPLS. REMark-Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 13(2), 56-73.
https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v13i2.2717
Roe, R. A. (1999). Work performance: A multiple regulation perspective. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology 1999, Vol. 14, (pp. 231–335). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of managerial psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
Santos, A., Chambel, M. J., & Castanheira, F. (2016). Relational job characteristics and nurses’ affective organizational commitment: The mediating role of work engagement. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(2), 294-305.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12834
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 3(1), 71-92.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
Shareena, P., & Shahid, M. (2020). Work from home during COVID-19: Employees perception and experiences. Global Journal for Research Analysis, 9(5), 1-3.
Shuck, B. (2011). Integrative literature review: Four emerging perspectives of employee engagement: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 10(3), 304-328.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484311410840
Smite, D., Moe, N. B., Hildrum, J., Gonzalez-Huerta, J., & Mendez, D. (2023). Work-from-home is here to stay: Call for flexibility in post-pandemic work policies. Journal of Systems and Software, 195, 111552.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111552
Sonnentag, S. (1998). Expertise in professional software design: A process study. Journal of applied psychology, 83(5), 703.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.703
Sporsem, T., & Moe, N. B. (2022). Coordination strategies when working from anywhere: a case study of two agile teams. In Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming: 23rd International Conference on Agile Software Development, XP 2022, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 13–17, 2022, Proceedings (pp. 52-61). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2015). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301-328.
Truss, C., Shantz, A., Soane, E., Alfes, K., & Delbridge, R. (2013). Employee engagement, organisational performance and individual well-being: exploring the evidence, developing the theory. The international journal of human resource management, 24(14), 2657-2669.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.798921
Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management journal, 41(1), 108-119.
https://doi.org/10.5465/256902
Viana, L. P., Chitó, R. É., & Hoffmeister, D. (2022). A PERCEPÇÃO DA LIDERANÇA SOBRE A PRODUTIVIDADE NO TRABALHO HÍBRIDO: UM ESTUDO DE CASO NO SETOR BANCÁRIO. Cippus, 10(1).
http://dx.doi.org/10.18316/cippus.v10i1.9736
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation.
Wojdylo, K., Baumann, N., Fischbach, L., & Engeser, S. (2014). Live to work or love to work: Work craving and work engagement. PLoS One, 9(10), e106379.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106379
Xu, Q., Zhao, Y., Xi, M., & Zhao, S. (2018). Impact of benevolent leadership on follower taking charge: Roles of work engagement and role-breadth self-efficacy. Chinese management studies.
https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-03-2018-0448
Yang, D., He, Q., Cui, Q., & Hsu, S. C. (2020). Non-economic motivations for organizational citizenship behavior in construction megaprojects. International Journal of Project Management, 38(1), 64-74.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.09.006
Yasenov, V. (2020). Who Can Work from Home? IZA Discussion Paper No. 13197.
https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3590895
Zamani, N. F. M., Hanafi, M., Ghani, M., Radzi, S. F. M., Rahmat, N. H., Kadar, N. S. A., & Azram, A. A. R. (2021). A study of work from home motivation among employees. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 11(8), 388-398.
https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2021.118.388.398
Zepke, N., Leach, L., & Butler, P. (2010). Engagement in post‐compulsory education: students' motivation and action. Research in Post‐Compulsory Education, 15(1), 1-17.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13596740903565269
Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., Dallas, M., Xu, S., & Hu, J. (2018). How perceived empowerment HR practices influence work engagement in social enterprises–a moderated mediation
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Gestão & Tecnologia
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Os direitos, inclusive os de tradução, são reservados. É permitido citar parte de artigos sem autorização prévia desde que seja identificada a fonte. A reprodução total de artigos é proibida. Em caso de dúvidas, consulte o Editor.
