Cenários para o futuro da educação a distância
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2019.v19i2.1602Palavras-chave:
Ensino a Distância, Cenários, Educação Superior.Resumo
A evolução do uso da Educação a Distância (EaD) é promovido a partir do avanço da tecnologia e, tem se mostrado como uma tendência para a educação nos próximos anos, além de ser uma oportunidade de negócio. O nosso objetivo neste estudo foi elaborar cenários para a EaD em Instituições de Ensino Superior (IES). Realizamos uma pesquisa bibliométrica utilizando o métodos de acoplamento bibliográfico, no qual extraídos utilizando o software VOSViewer, três clusters que proporcionaram a definição dos seguintes cenários: Comunidade de investigação, Interação e-learning e Ambientes de aprendizado combinado. Concluímos que a interpretação das tendências de estudos futuros transformadas em cenários para a EaD em IES, são úteis para a gestão desse modelo de educação que está em ascensão e que no futuro poderá dominar o método tradicional de ensino, mas os três cenários apresentados também evidenciaram que a interação não deixará de ser fator importante de satisfação.
Referências
Abraham, T. (2002). Evaluating the virtual management information systems (MIS) classroom. Journal of Information Systems Education, 13(2), 125–133.
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. M. (2011). Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2-3), 82-103.
Al-Shammari, M. (2005). Assessing the learning experience in a business process reengineering (BPR) course at the University of Bahrain. Business Process Management Journal, 11(1), 47–62.
Anderson, T. D., & Garrison, D. R. (1995). Critical thinking in distance education: Developing critical communities in an audio teleconference context. Higher Education, 29(2), 183–199.
Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2), 9–14.
Arbaugh, J. B., Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the community of inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 37–44.
Arbaugh, J. B., Godfrey, M. R., Johnson, M., Pollack, B. L., Niendorf, B., & Wresch, W. (2009). Research in online and blended learning in the business disciplines: Key findings and possible future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(2), 71-87.
Arbaugh, J. B., & Warell, S. S. (2009). Distance learning and web-based instruction in management education. In S. J. Armstrong & C.V. Fukami (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of management learning, education, and development (pp. 231–254). London: SAGE
Publications.
Barnard, L., Lan,W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 12, 1–6.
Beldarrain, Y. (2008, November). Integrating interaction in distance learning: A comparative analysis of five design frameworks. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education(pp. 1471-1477). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Berger, N. S. (1999). Pioneering experiences in distance learning: Lessons learned. Journal of Management Education, 23, 684–690.
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Tamim, R., Surkes, M. A. (2009). A meta-analysis of three interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289.
Boaventura, J. M. G, Costa, B. K, & Fischmann, A. (2005) Cenários: metodologia e métodos de construção. In Costa, B. K. & Almeida, M. I. R. Estratégia: direcionando negócios e organizações. São Paulo: Atlas, 2005. Cap. 1 p.23-44.
Bowen, V. S. (1996). The relationship of locus of control and cognitive style to selfinstructional strategies, sequencing, and outcomes in a learner-controlled multimedia environment. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 56(10-A), 3922 Apr 1996.
Bryant, K., Campbell, J., & Kerr, D. (2003). Impact of web based flexible learning on academic performance in information systems. Journal of Information Systems Education, 14(1), 41–50.
Bryant, S. M., Kahle, J. B., & Schafer, B. A. (2005). Distance education: A review of the contemporary literature. Issues in Accounting Education, 20, 255–272.
Broad, M. C. (1999). The dynamics of quality assurance in online distance education. Electronic Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 3(1), 12-21.
Brophy, J. E. (1999). Teaching: Educational practices series, Vol. 1,
Bruner, J. (1985). Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective. Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives, 21, 34.
Cook, D. A. (2009). The failure of e-learning research to inform educational practice and what we can do about it. Medical Teacher, 31(2), 158–162.
Cunningham, C. A., & Billingsley, M. (2003). Curriculum Webs: A practical guide to weaving the Web into teaching and learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
de Almeida, M. E. B. (2003). Educação a distância na internet: abordagens e contribuições dos ambientes digitais de aprendizagem. Educação e pesquisa, 29(2), 327-340.
Daspit, J. J., & D’Souza, D. E. (2012). Using the Community of Inquiry Framework to Introduce Wiki Environments in Blended-Learning Pedagogies: Evidence From a Business Capstone Course. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(4), 666–683.
Dias, M. A. de P., Vianna, J. N. de S., & Felby, C. (2016). Sustainability in the prospective scenarios methods: A case study of scenarios for biodiesel industry in Brazil, for 2030. Futures, 82, 1–14.
Ehlers, U. (2004). Quality in e-learning. The learner as a key quality assurance category. European Journal of Vocational Training, 29, 3−15.
Furrer, O. & Thomas, H. (2000), The rivalry matrix: understanding rivalry and competitive dynamics, European Management Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 619-37.
Garrison, D. R. (1991). Critical thinking and adult education: A conceptual model for developing critical thinking in adult learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 10(4), 287–303.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87–105.
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172.
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148.
Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2009). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 31–36.
Georgantzas, N. C., & Acar, W. (1995). Scenario-driven planning: learning to manage strategic uncertainty. Praeger.
Gunawardena, L., Lowe, C., & Anderson, T. (1997). Interaction analysis of a global online debate and the development of a constructivist interaction analysis model for computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 395–429.
Hagaman, S. (1990). The community of inquiry: An approach to collaborative learning. Studies in Art Education, 31(3), 149–157.
Han, H., & Johnson, S. D. (2012). Relationship between students' emotional intelligence, social bond, and interactions in online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 78–89.
Harasim, L. (2000). Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. Internet and Higher Education, 3(1–2), 41–61.
Heckman, R., & Annabi, H. (2005). A content analytic comparison of learning processes in online and face-to-face case study discussions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(2).
Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2006). Authentic tasks online: A synergy among learner, task, and technology. Distance Education, 27(2), 233–247.
INEP. (2018) Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira. Disponível em: <http://portal.inep.gov.br/web/guest/inicio>.
Hickey, D., & McCaslin, M. (2001). A Comparative, socio-cultural analysis of context and motivation. In S. Volet & S. Ja¨rvala¨ (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical advancements and methodological implications (pp. 33–55). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
Hirumi, A. (2011). The design and sequencing of online and blended learning interactions: A framework for grounded design. Canadian Learning Journal, 16(2), 21–25.
Hollenbeck, C. R., Zinkhan, G. M., & French, W. (2005). Distance learning trends and benchmarks: Lessons from an online MBA program. Marketing Education Review, 15(2), 39–52.
Jaspers, F. (1991). Interactivity or instruction? A reaction to Merrill. Educational Technology, 31(3), 21–24.
Juwah, C. (Ed.). (2006). Interactions in online learning: Implications for theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
Klein, H. J., Noe, R. A., &Wang, C. (2006). Motivation to learn and course outcomes: The impact of delivery mode, learning goal orientation, and perceived barriers and enablers. Personnel Psychology, 59, 665–702.
Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall/Cambridge.
Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 24−33.
Kramarski, B., & Mizrachi, N. (2006). Online discussion and self-regulated learning: Effects of instructionalmethods onmathematical literacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 218−230.
Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35-50.
Lan,W. Y. (1996). The effects of self-monitoring on students' course performance, use of learning strategies, attitude, self-judgment ability, and knowledge representation. Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 101−115.
Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers and Education, 51(2), 864–873.
Lipman, M. (1976). Philosophy for children. Metaphilosophy, 7(1), 17–33.
Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mannermaa, M. (1991). In search of an evolutionary paradigm for futures research. Futures, 23(4), 349-372.
Martins, P. P. P., Boaventura, J. M. G., Fischmann, A. A., Costa, B. K., & Spers, R. G. (2012). Scenarios for the Brazilian Road Freight Transport Industry. Foresight, 14(3), 207–224.
Molenda, M. (2008). Historical Foundations. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. New York, NY: Springer New York.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–6.
Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical
principles of distance education (pp. 22–28). New York, NY: Routledge.
Oliveira, A. S., Barros, M. D. de, Pereira, F. de C., Gomes, C. F. S., & Costa, H. G. da. (2018). Prospective scenarios: A literature review on the Scopus database. Futures, 100, 20–33.
Paechter, M., & Maier, B. (2010). Online or face-to-face? Students' experiences and preferences in e-learning. The internet and higher education, 13(4), 292-297.
Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25, 401–426.
Porter, M. E. (1985)Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press.
Proserpio, L., & Gioia, D. A. (2007). Teaching the virtual generation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6, 69–80.
Ringland, G. (1998), Scenario Planning – Managing for the Future, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Rungtusanatham, M., Ellram, L. M., Siferd, S. P., & Salik, S. (2004). Toward a typology of business education in the Internet age. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 2, 101–120.
Sankaran, S. R., & Bui, T. X. (2001). Impact of learning strategies and motivation on performance: A study in web-based instruction. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28, 191–198.
Sankaran, S. R., Sankaran, D., & Bui, T. (2000). Effect of student attitude to course format of learning performance: An empirical study in web vs. lecture instruction. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27, 66–73.
Schwartz, P. (2000). A arte da visão de longo prazo. São Paulo: Nova Cultural.
Sims, R. (1999). Interactivity on stage: Strategies for learner-designer communication. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 257–272.
Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R. (2006). The comparative
effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 59, 623–664.
Soong, M. . B., Chan, H. C., Chua, B. C., & Loh, K. F. (2001). Benson Soong et al- (2001) Critical success factors for on-line course resources- Computers and education. Computers & Education, 36.
Storopoli, J. E. (2016). O uso do Knowledge discovery in database (KDD) de informações patentárias sobre ensino a distância: contribuições para instituições de ensino superior. Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103618
Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers and Education, 50(4), 1183–1202.
Sutton, L. A. (2001). The principle of vicarious interaction in computer-mediated communications. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(3), 223–242.
Trickey, S., & Topping, K. J. (2004). “Philosophy for children”: a systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 19(3), 365–380.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wade, W. (2012). Scenario planning: a field guide to the future. New Jersey: Wiley & Sons Inc.
Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6–29.
Walker, K. (2003). Applying distributed learning theory in online business communication courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 66(2), 55–67.
Wan, Z., Fang, Y., & Neufeld, D. J. (2007). The role of information technology in technology-mediated learning: A review of the past for the future. Journal of Information Systems Education, 18, 183–192.
Young, A., & Norgard, C. (2006). Assessing the quality of online courses from the students' perspective. The Internet and Higher Education, 9, 107−115.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal,
(1), 166–183.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Gestão & Tecnologia
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Os direitos, inclusive os de tradução, são reservados. É permitido citar parte de artigos sem autorização prévia desde que seja identificada a fonte. A reprodução total de artigos é proibida. Em caso de dúvidas, consulte o Editor.
