Analysis of the performance of the brazilian intellectual property system: challenges and perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2018.v18i2.1249Palavras-chave:
Intellectual Property, Performance Indicators, Brazil.Resumo
The protection of intellectual property (IP) is a crucial area to support the development process of any country, as it is in this context that the biggest strategic disputes are taking place. In recent years Brazil has developed some actions to achieve greater efficiency in the public IP management system, but are we on the right track? The present study seeks to present answers regarding the performance of Brazil and to highlight the advances and challenges regarding the IP system. The methodological approach was structured based on a review in the literature, highlighting the scientific, economic and technological indicators on the development of IP and the main IP objects registered with the Brazilian national intellectual property body (INPI) in the period of 2013 to 2016, in the areas of patents, trademarks, industrial design, computer program, circuit topography, technology contracts and geographical indication.
Referências
Ávila, J. (2007, April). O INPI e a Propriedade Intelectual no Brasil: resultados e metas. Proceedings of the Congresso Brasileiro de Inovação na Indústria, São Paulo, Brazil, 2.
Brüggemann, J., Crosetto, P., Meub, L., & Bizer, K. (2016). Intellectual property rights hinder sequential innovation.Experimental evidence. Research Policy. 45, 2054–2068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.07.008
Cavalheiro, G., Joia, L. A., & Veenstra, A. (2016). Examining the trajectory of a standard for patent classification: An institutional account of a technical cooperation between EPO and USPTO. Technology in Society. 46, 10 -17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.04.004
Deardorff, A. (1992). Welfare effects of global patent protection. Economica. 59, 35–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555064
DeNegri, J.A. (Ed.) n/a et al. (2008). Políticas de Incentivo à Inovação Tecnológica no Brasil. Brasília: Ipea. Available at: http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5569 (accessed 11 Sept 2015).
Donoso, J. F. (2017). A simple index of innovation with complexity. Journal of Informetrics. 11, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.009
Forero-Pineda, C. (2006). The impact of stronger intellectual property rights on science and technology in developing countries. Research Policy. 35, 808–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.003
Hudson, J., & Minea, A., (2013). Innovation, Intellectual Property Rights, and Economic Development: A Unified Empirical Investigation. World Development. 46, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.023
International Chamber of Commerce. (2016). The Economic Impacts of Counterfeiting and Piracy (report prepared for BASCAP and INTA). ICC. Available at: https://cdn.iccwbo.org/content/uploads/sites/3/2017/02/ICC-BASCAP-Frontier-report-2016.pdf> (accessed 19 May 2017).
Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial. (INPI). (2009). Relatório de Gestão de 2009. Rio de Janeiro: Inpi/MDIC. Available at: <https://www.inpi.gov.br> (accessed 11 May 2015).
Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial (INPI). (2016). Boletim Mensal de Propriedade Industrial: Ranking dos Depositantes Residentes 2015 (Estatísticas Preliminares). Rio de Janeiro v.1, n. especial, p. 1-17, maio. (Available at: < http://www.inpi.gov.br/sobre/estatisticas/boletim-mensal> (accessed 14 February 2017).
Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial (INPI). (2017). Boletim Mensal de Propriedade Industrial: Estatísticas Preliminares. Rio de Janeiro v.2, n. 2, pp. 1-19, fev. Available at: < http://www.inpi.gov.br/sobre/estatisticas/arquivos/publicacoes/boletim_fev-2017.pdf> (accessed 14 February 2017).
Jandhyala, S. (2015). International and domestic dynamics of intellectual property protection. Journal of World Business. 50(2), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2014.10.005
Jungmann, D., & Bonetti E. (2010). A caminho da inovação: proteção e negócios com bens de propriedade intelectual: Guia para o empresário. Brasília: IEL.
Lei nº 10.973, de 2 de dezembro de 2004. Dispõe sobre incentivos à inovação e à pesquisa científica e tecnológica no ambiente produtivo e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2004-2006/2004/Lei/L10.973.htm (acessed 11 May 2015).
Matias-Pereira, J. (2011). A gestão do sistema de proteção à propriedade intelectual no Brasil é consistente?. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 2(2), 44-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v2i2.24
MINISTÉRIO DA CIÊNCIA, TECNOLOGIA E INOVAÇÃO (MCTI). (2016). Estratégia Nacional de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação 2016-2019. Brasília: MCTI. Available at: http://www.mcti.gov.br/documents/10179/1712401/Estrat%C3%A9gia+Nacional+de+Ci%C3%AAncia%2C%20Tecnologia+e+Inova%C3%A7%C3%A3o+2016-2019/0cfb61e1-1b84-4323-b136-8c3a5f2a4bb7 (accessed 17 November 2016).
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2014). Going for Growth. Country Note on Brazil. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris.
Papageorgiadis, N., Alexiou, C., & Nellis, J. (2016). International licensing revisited: the role of copyright and trademark enforcement strength. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(2), 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2015-0014
Russo, S. L. (Org.). n/a et al. (2017). Propriedade Intelectual, Tecnologias e Empreendedorismo. Aracaju: Associação Acadêmica de Propriedade Intelectual.
Stal, E., & Fujino, A. (2016). The evolution of universities’ relations with the business sector in Brazil: What national publications between 1980 and 2012 reveal. Revista de Administração, São Paulo, 51(1), 72-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.5700/rausp1224
Tanaka, H., & Iwaisako, T. (2014). Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment: A welfare analysis. European Economic Review. 67, 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.01.013
Thursby, J., & Thursby, M. (2011). Has the Bayh-Dole act compromised basic research? Research Policy, 40(8), 1077-1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.009
Santos, M. E. R. (Org.). n/a et al. (2009). Transferência de tecnologia: estratégias para a estruturação e gestão de Núcleos de Inovação Tecnológica. Campinas: Komedi, 21-37.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2015). UNESCO Science Report: Towards 2030. Unesco. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002354/235406e.pdf (accessed 26 September 2016).
United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2015). Available at: <https://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/search-patents>. (accessed 16 November 2015).
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Gestão & Tecnologia
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Os direitos, inclusive os de tradução, são reservados. É permitido citar parte de artigos sem autorização prévia desde que seja identificada a fonte. A reprodução total de artigos é proibida. Em caso de dúvidas, consulte o Editor.
