Analysis of the performance of the brazilian intellectual property system: challenges and perspectives

Cleiton Rodrigues de Vasconcelos, Daniel Pereira da Silva

Resumo


The protection of intellectual property (IP) is a crucial area to support the development process of any country, as it is in this context that the biggest strategic disputes are taking place. In recent years Brazil has developed some actions to achieve greater efficiency in the public IP management system, but are we on the right track? The present study seeks to present answers regarding the performance of Brazil and to highlight the advances and challenges regarding the IP system. The methodological approach was structured based on a review in the literature, highlighting the scientific, economic and technological indicators on the development of IP and the main IP objects registered with the Brazilian national intellectual property body (INPI) in the period of 2013 to 2016, in the areas of patents, trademarks, industrial design, computer program, circuit topography, technology contracts and geographical indication.


Palavras-chave


Intellectual Property; Performance Indicators; Brazil.

Texto completo:

PDF

Referências


Ávila, J. (2007, April). O INPI e a Propriedade Intelectual no Brasil: resultados e metas. Proceedings of the Congresso Brasileiro de Inovação na Indústria, São Paulo, Brazil, 2.

Brüggemann, J., Crosetto, P., Meub, L., & Bizer, K. (2016). Intellectual property rights hinder sequential innovation.Experimental evidence. Research Policy. 45, 2054–2068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.07.008

Cavalheiro, G., Joia, L. A., & Veenstra, A. (2016). Examining the trajectory of a standard for patent classification: An institutional account of a technical cooperation between EPO and USPTO. Technology in Society. 46, 10 -17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.04.004

Deardorff, A. (1992). Welfare effects of global patent protection. Economica. 59, 35–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555064

DeNegri, J.A. (Ed.) n/a et al. (2008). Políticas de Incentivo à Inovação Tecnológica no Brasil. Brasília: Ipea. Available at: http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5569 (accessed 11 Sept 2015).

Donoso, J. F. (2017). A simple index of innovation with complexity. Journal of Informetrics. 11, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.009

Forero-Pineda, C. (2006). The impact of stronger intellectual property rights on science and technology in developing countries. Research Policy. 35, 808–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.003

Hudson, J., & Minea, A., (2013). Innovation, Intellectual Property Rights, and Economic Development: A Unified Empirical Investigation. World Development. 46, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.023

International Chamber of Commerce. (2016). The Economic Impacts of Counterfeiting and Piracy (report prepared for BASCAP and INTA). ICC. Available at: https://cdn.iccwbo.org/content/uploads/sites/3/2017/02/ICC-BASCAP-Frontier-report-2016.pdf> (accessed 19 May 2017).

Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial. (INPI). (2009). Relatório de Gestão de 2009. Rio de Janeiro: Inpi/MDIC. Available at: (accessed 11 May 2015).

Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial (INPI). (2016). Boletim Mensal de Propriedade Industrial: Ranking dos Depositantes Residentes 2015 (Estatísticas Preliminares). Rio de Janeiro v.1, n. especial, p. 1-17, maio. (Available at: < http://www.inpi.gov.br/sobre/estatisticas/boletim-mensal> (accessed 14 February 2017).

Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial (INPI). (2017). Boletim Mensal de Propriedade Industrial: Estatísticas Preliminares. Rio de Janeiro v.2, n. 2, pp. 1-19, fev. Available at: < http://www.inpi.gov.br/sobre/estatisticas/arquivos/publicacoes/boletim_fev-2017.pdf> (accessed 14 February 2017).

Jandhyala, S. (2015). International and domestic dynamics of intellectual property protection. Journal of World Business. 50(2), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2014.10.005

Jungmann, D., & Bonetti E. (2010). A caminho da inovação: proteção e negócios com bens de propriedade intelectual: Guia para o empresário. Brasília: IEL.

Lei nº 10.973, de 2 de dezembro de 2004. Dispõe sobre incentivos à inovação e à pesquisa científica e tecnológica no ambiente produtivo e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2004-2006/2004/Lei/L10.973.htm (acessed 11 May 2015).

Matias-Pereira, J. (2011). A gestão do sistema de proteção à propriedade intelectual no Brasil é consistente?. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 2(2), 44-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v2i2.24

MINISTÉRIO DA CIÊNCIA, TECNOLOGIA E INOVAÇÃO (MCTI). (2016). Estratégia Nacional de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação 2016-2019. Brasília: MCTI. Available at: http://www.mcti.gov.br/documents/10179/1712401/Estrat%C3%A9gia+Nacional+de+Ci%C3%AAncia%2C%20Tecnologia+e+Inova%C3%A7%C3%A3o+2016-2019/0cfb61e1-1b84-4323-b136-8c3a5f2a4bb7 (accessed 17 November 2016).

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2014). Going for Growth. Country Note on Brazil. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris.

Papageorgiadis, N., Alexiou, C., & Nellis, J. (2016). International licensing revisited: the role of copyright and trademark enforcement strength. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(2), 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2015-0014

Russo, S. L. (Org.). n/a et al. (2017). Propriedade Intelectual, Tecnologias e Empreendedorismo. Aracaju: Associação Acadêmica de Propriedade Intelectual.

Stal, E., & Fujino, A. (2016). The evolution of universities’ relations with the business sector in Brazil: What national publications between 1980 and 2012 reveal. Revista de Administração, São Paulo, 51(1), 72-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.5700/rausp1224

Tanaka, H., & Iwaisako, T. (2014). Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment: A welfare analysis. European Economic Review. 67, 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.01.013

Thursby, J., & Thursby, M. (2011). Has the Bayh-Dole act compromised basic research? Research Policy, 40(8), 1077-1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.009

Santos, M. E. R. (Org.). n/a et al. (2009). Transferência de tecnologia: estratégias para a estruturação e gestão de Núcleos de Inovação Tecnológica. Campinas: Komedi, 21-37.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2015). UNESCO Science Report: Towards 2030. Unesco. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002354/235406e.pdf (accessed 26 September 2016).

United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2015). Available at: . (accessed 16 November 2015).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2018.v18i2.1249

Métricas do artigo

Carregando Métricas ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Bookmark and Share


Direitos autorais 2018 Revista Gestão & Tecnologia

Licença Creative Commons
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição - NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.